Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
"ERGO Insurance" SE v "If P&C Insurance" AS and "Gjensidige Baltic" AAS v "PZU Lietuva" UAB DK (C-359/14, C-475/14)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referre…
40

"ERGO Insurance" SE v "If P&C Insurance" AS and "Gjensidige Baltic" AAS v "PZU Lietuva" UAB DK (C-359/14, C-475/14)

Judgment of 21 Jan 2016law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-359-14/para_40@2026-11-10

40There is nothing in the wording or the objectives of Directive 2009/13 to suggest that it is intended to lay down conflict-of-law rules.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Cases: C-359/14, C-475/14 · ECLI:EU:C:2016:40
Decided: 21 Jan 2016
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Vilniaus miesto apylinkės teismas (District Court of the City of Vilnius, Lithuania) and the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Supreme Court of Lithuania)
Applicant: ERGO Insurance SE
Defendants: If P&C Insurance AS Gjensidige Baltic AAS; PZU Lietuva UAB DK
Rapporteur: M. Safjan
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 5 judges
L. Bay Larsen, J. Malenovský, M. Safjan, S. Prechal, K. Jürimäe
Language: Lithuanian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0359

Topics

Judicial cooperation in civil matters

History · 1 version

21 Jan 2016Reading

Connections

Interprets 3: Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I)2 provisions; Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 (Rome II); Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability (Codified version) (Text with EEA relevance)
Cited by 10: Saale Kareda v Stefan Benkö (C-249/16); Agostinho da Silva Martins v Dekra Claims Services Portugal SA (C-149/18)2 provisions; Feniks Sp. z o.o. v Azteca Products & Services SL (C-337/17); Nintendo Co. Ltd v BigBen Interactive GmbH and BigBen Interactive SA (C-24/16, C-25/16); this act; Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Amazon EU Sàrl (C-191/15); ZK v BMA Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt AG (C-498/20); Fonds de Garantie des Victimes des Actes de Terrorisme et d’Autres Infractions (FGTI) v Victoria Seguros SA (C-264/22)2 provisions; HRVATSKE ŠUME d.o.o., Zagreb v BP Europa SE (C-242/20); AU v Reliantco Investments LTD and Reliantco Investments LTD Limassol Sucursala Bucureşti (C-500/18)
Cites 7: Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I); Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 (Rome II); Harald Kolassa v Barclays Bank plc (C-375/13); Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability (Codified version) (Text with EEA relevance); ÖFAB, Östergötlands Fastigheter AB v Frank Koot and Evergreen Investments BV (C-147/12); Florin Lazar, représenté légalement par Luigi Erculeo v Allianz SpA (C-350/14)