Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-358/14)
Judgment
The action
The legality of the contested provisions
The third plea in law, alleging infrin…
–Findings of the Court
113

Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-358/14)

Judgment of 4 May 2016law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-358-14/para_113@2026-11-11

113Subsequently, responsibility for that review lies with the EU judicature, which must verify both compliance with the substantive conditions set out in Article 5(3) TEU and compliance with the procedural safeguards provided for by that Protocol.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-358/14 · ECLI:EU:C:2016:323
Decided: 4 May 2016
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Republic of Poland
Defendants: European Parliament; Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: A. Arabadjiev
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, A. Arabadjiev, C. Lycourgos, J.-C. Bonichot
Language: Polish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0358

Topics

Principles of Union law

History · 1 version

4 May 2016Reading

Connections

Cited by 20: Liga van Moskeeën en Islamitische Organisaties Provincie Antwerpen, VZW and Others v Vlaams Gewest (C-426/16); Czech Republic v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-482/17); Amazon EU Sàrl, venant aux droits de Amazon Services Europe Sàrl v European Commission (T-367/23); Bundesminister für Soziales, Gesundheit, Pflege und Konsumentenschutz v M M (C-717/23); Deutsche Bank AG v Single Resolution Board (T-396/21); Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v Single Resolution Board (T-384/21); BNP Paribas v Single Resolution Board (T-397/21); La Banque postale v Single Resolution Board (T-383/21); Société générale and Others v Single Resolution Board (T-387/21); BPCE and Others v Single Resolution Board (T-385/21); Crédit agricole SA and Others v Single Resolution Board (T-388/21); Illumina, Inc. v European Commission (T-227/21)2 provisions; Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza Chłodnictwa i Klimatyzacji v European Commission (T-126/19); Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-128/17); Planta Tabak-Manufaktur Dr. Manfred Obermann GmbH & Co. KG v Land Berlin (C-220/17); Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health (C-151/17); Günter Hartmann Tabakvertrieb GmbH & Co. KG v Stadt Kempten (C-425/17); Leïmonia Sotiropoulou and Others v Council of the European Union (T-531/14); Philip Morris Ltd v European Commission (T-18/15); Philip Morris Ltd v European Commission (T-796/14)
Cites 16: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Peter Gauweiler and Others v Deutscher Bundestag (C-62/14); The Queen, on the application of Alliance for Natural Health and Nutri-Link Ltd v Secretary of State for Health and The Queen, on the application of National Association of Health Stores and Health Food Manufacturers Ltd v Secretary of State for Health and National Assembly for Wales (C-154/04, C-155/04); Federal Republic of Germany v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-376/98); The Queen v Secretary of State for Health, ex parte British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd and Imperial Tobacco Ltd (C-491/01); The Queen, on the application of Vodafone Ltd and Others v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (C-58/08); Grand Duchy of Luxemburg v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-176/09); Raffinerie Mediterranee (ERG) SpA, Polimeri Europa SpA and Syndial SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo economico and Others and ENI SpA v Ministero Ambiente e Tutela del Territorio e del Mare and Others (C-379/08, C-380/08); Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC Text with EEA relevance; United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-270/12); Federal Republic of Germany v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-380/03); Republic of Estonia v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-508/13); Arnold André GmbH & Co. KG v Landrat des Kreises Herford (C-434/02); The Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health (C-210/03); Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-358/14)