Judgment_paragraph 67 · R.L. Trijber v College van Burgemeester en Wethouders van Amsterdam and J. Harmsen v Burgemeester van Amsterdam (C-340/14, C-341/14)

67By its third question in Case C‑341/14, the referring court asks, in essence, whether Article 10(2)(c) of Directive 2006/123 must be interpreted as precluding a measure, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which the grant of authorisation for the exercise of an activity consisting in the operation of window prostitution businesses by renting rooms out in shifts is subject to the condition that the service provider is able to communicate in a language which is understood by the recipients of those services, in this case prostitutes.