Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Quenon K. SPRL v Beobank SA and Metlife Insurance SA (C-338/14)
Judgment
The questions referred for a prelimina…
The first question
22

Quenon K. SPRL v Beobank SA and Metlife Insurance SA (C-338/14)

Judgment of 3 Dec 2015law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-338-14/para_22@2026-11-11

22The directive aims to coordinate the laws of the Member States as regards the legal relationship between the parties to a commercial agency contract (judgments in Honyvem Informazioni Commerciali, C‑465/04, EU:C:2006:199, paragraph 18, and Unamar, C‑184/12, EU:C:2013:663, paragraph 36).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-338/14 · ECLI:EU:C:2015:795
Decided: 3 Dec 2015
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Cour d’appel de Brussels (Court of Appeal, Brussels) (Belgium)
Applicant: Quenon K. SPRL
Defendants: Beobank SA; Metlife Insurance SA
Rapporteur: K. Jürimäe
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
L. Bay Larsen, J. Malenovský, M. Safjan, A. Prechal, K. Jürimäe
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0338

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment

History · 1 version

3 Dec 2015Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Directive 86/653/EEC3 provisions
Cited by 6: Marchon Germany GmbH v Yvonne Karaszkiewicz (C-315/14); ERGO Poist’ovňa, a.s. v Alžbeta Barlíková (C-48/16); Agro Foreign Trade & Agency Ltd v Petersime NV (C-507/15); QT v 02 Czech Republic a. s (C-574/21); NY v Herios SARL (C-593/21); Zako SPRL v Sanidel SA (C-452/17)2 provisions
Cites 8: Council Directive 86/653/EEC; United Antwerp Maritime Agencies (Unamar) NV v Navigation Maritime Bulgare (C-184/12)2 provisions; Honyvem Informazioni Commerciali Srl v Mariella De Zotti (C-465/04)2 provisions; Turgay Semen v Deutsche Tamoil GmbH (C-348/07); Ingmar GB Ltd v Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc (C-381/98); Poseidon Chartering BV v Marianne Zeeschip VOF and Others (C-3/04); Quenon K. SPRL v Beobank SA and Metlife Insurance SA (C-338/14); Volvo Car Germany GmbH v Autohof Weidensdorf GmbH (C-203/09)