Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Mory SA and Others v European Commission (C-33/14 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The first ground of appeal
Findings of the Court
58

Mory SA and Others v European Commission (C-33/14 P)

Judgment of 17 Sept 2015law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-33-14/para_58@2026-11-10

58The interest in bringing proceedings is an essential and fundamental prerequisite for any legal proceedings (see, to that effect, order in S. v Commission, 206/89 R, EU:C:1989:333, paragraph 8, and judgment in Andechser Molkerei Scheitz v Commission, C‑682/13 P, EU:C:2015:356, paragraph 27).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-33/14 P · ECLI:EU:C:2015:609
Decided: 17 Sept 2015
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62012TO0545
Applicants: Mory SA; Mory Team; Superga Invest
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: A. Ó Caoimh
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, A. Ó Caoimh, C. Toader, E. Jarašiūnas, C.G. Fernlund
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0033

Topics

History · 1 version

17 Sept 2015Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Mory SA and Others v European Commission (T-545/12)
Cited by 25: Swissgrid AG v European Commission (T-127/21); Asociación Profesional de Empresas de Reparto y Manipulado de Correspondencia (Asempre) v European Commission (C-124/24); Uno Organización Empresarial de Logística y Transporte v European Commission (C-126/24); MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (T-523/22); MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (T-524/22); Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission (T-412/22); Aurelia Stiftung v European Commission (T-565/23); Pollinis France v European Commission (T-94/23); KF v European Investment Bank (T-330/24); Mowi Poland S.A. v European Commission (T-354/24); European Central Bank and European Commission v Francesca Corneli (C-777/22); RWE Supply & Trading GmbH v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-95/23); Uniper Global Commodities SE v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-96/23); MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v Single Resolution Board (T-450/22); Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-679/20); European Commission and Others v Carpatair SA (C-244/23 P); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-743/21); Giovanni Frajese v European Commission (C-586/23 P); Lucien Haddad v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-538/23); Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission (T-827/22); Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko and Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union (T-644/22); Mikhail Fridman and Others v Council of the European Union (T-635/22); PH and Others v European Central Bank (T-323/22); SBM Développement SAS v European Commission (T-667/22); European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Indo European Foods Ltd (C-801/21 P)
Cites 22: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; T & L Sugars Ltd and Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda v European Commission (C-456/13 P); Telefónica SA v European Commission (C-274/12 P); Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-583/11 P); Sniace SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-260/05 P); E.ON Energie AG v European Commission (C-89/11 P); Plaumann & Co. v Commission of the European Economic Community (C-25/62); Stichting Woonpunt and Others v European Commission (C-132/12 P); Stichting Woonlinie and Others v European Commission (C-133/12 P); British Aggregates Association v Commission of the European Communities and United Kingdom (C-487/06); French Republic and Société commerciale des potasses et de l'azote (SCPA) and Entreprise minière et chimique (EMC) v Commission of the European Communities (C-68/94, C-30/95); European Commission v Kronoply GmbH & Co. KG and Kronotex GmbH & Co. KG (C-83/09 P); 3F v Commission of the European Communities (C-319/07); Planet AE Anonymi Etaireia Parochis Symvouleftikon Ypiresion v European Commission (C-564/13 P); Ryanair Ltd v European Commission (T-123/09); Karl Könecke Fleischwarenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (C-76/79); Andechser Molkerei Scheitz GmbH v European Commission (C-682/13); Commission of the European Communities v Koninklijke FrieslandCampina NV (C-519/07); Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Triglav d.d (C-162/13); European Commission v Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Srl and Parker-Hannifin Corp (C-434/13 P); S v Commission of the European Communities (C-206/89); Abdulbasit Abdulrahim v Council of the European Union and European Commission (C-239/12 P)