Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Gebhart Hiebler v Walter Schlagbauer (C-293/14)
Order
Consideration of the questions referred
Question 2
51

Gebhart Hiebler v Walter Schlagbauer (C-293/14)

Judgment of 23 Dec 2015law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-293-14/para_51@2026-11-11

51Second, Article 15(2)(a) of Directive 2006/123 expressly classifies ‘territorial restrictions’ on the pursuit of a service activity as ‘requirements’ within the meaning of Article 4(7) of the directive, which are conditions affecting the freedom of establishment of service providers.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-293/14 · ECLI:EU:C:2015:843
Decided: 23 Dec 2015
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court, Austria)
Applicant: Gebhart Hiebler
Defendant: Walter Schlagbauer
Rapporteur: A. Tizzano
Advocate General: Szpunar
Bench: 5 judges
A. Tizzano, F. Biltgen, E. Levits, M. Berger, S. Rodin
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0293

Topics

Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services Internal market - Principles

History · 1 version

23 Dec 2015Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2006/123/EC6 provisions
Cited by 7: Administración General del Estado and Others v Asociación para la Defensa de los Intereses Comunes de las Autoescuelas (AUDICA) and Ministerio Fiscal (C-292/21); INTERZERO Trajnostne rešitve za svet brez odpadkov d.o.o. and Others and Surovina, družba za predelavo odpadkov d.o.o. and Others (C-254/23); Memoria Srl and Antonia Dall'Antonia v Comune di Padova (C-342/17); Repsol Butano SA and DISA Gas SAU v Administración del Estado (C-473/17, C-546/17)2 provisions; FA.RO. di YK & C. Sas v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli (C-16/23); Centro di Assistenza Doganale (Cad) Mellano Srl v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli - Agenzia delle Dogane - Direzione Interregionale per la Liguria and Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze (C-503/23)2 provisions; Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc. v European Commission and European Commission v Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc (C-293/13 P, C-294/13 P)
Cites 19: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Directive 2006/123/EC2 provisions; Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others v Rina Services SpA and Others (C-593/13); Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (C-438/08); Grupo Itevelesa SL and Others v Oca Inspección Técnica de Vehículos SA and Generalidad de Cataluña (C-168/14); Ministero dello Sviluppo economico and Autorità per la vigilanza sui contratti pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture v SOA Nazionale Costruttori — Organismo di Attestazione SpA (C-327/12); Fédération des maisons de repos privées de Belgique (Femarbel) ASBL v Commission communautaire commune de Brussels-Capitale (C-57/12); Ottica New Line di Accardi Vincenzo v Comune di Campobello di Mazara (C-539/11); Susanne Sokoll-Seebacher (C-367/12); Fallimento Traghetti del Mediterraneo SpA v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri (C-140/09); José Manuel Blanco Pérez and María del Pilar Chao Gómez v Consejería de Salud y Servicios Sanitarios and Principado de Asturias (C-570/07, C-571/07); European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-47/08); Hartlauer Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Wiener Landesregierung and Oberösterreichische Landesregierung (C-169/07); Firma Ambulanz Glöckner v Landkreis Südwestpfalz (C-475/99); Criminal proceedings against Paul Corbeau (C-320/91); Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-404/05); Albert Anker, Klaas Ras and Albertus Snoek v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-47/02); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (C-114/97); Gebhart Hiebler v Walter Schlagbauer (C-293/14)