Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Eugenia Florescu and Others v Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Sibiu and Others (C-258/14)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question
29

Eugenia Florescu and Others v Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Sibiu and Others (C-258/14)

Judgment of 13 Jun 2017law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-258-14/para_29@2026-11-10

29By its first question, the referring court asks in essence whether the Memorandum of Understanding whose interpretation is sought must be regarded as an act of an EU institution, within the meaning of Article 267 TFEU, which may be subject to interpretation by the Court.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-258/14 · ECLI:EU:C:2017:448
Decided: 13 Jun 2017
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Court of Appeal, Alba Iulia, Romania)
Applicants: Eugenia Florescu; Ioan Poiană and 3 more
Cosmina Diaconu; Anca Vidrighin; Eugenia Elena Bădilă
Defendants: Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Sibiu; Casa Națională de Pensii și alte Drepturi de Asigurări Sociale and 3 more
Ministerul Muncii, Familiei și Protecției Sociale; Statul roman; Ministerul Finanțelor Publice
Rapporteur: A. Borg Barthet
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 13 judges
K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, E. Juhász, M. Berger, A. Prechal, E. Regan, A. Rosas, A. Borg Barthet, M. Safjan, D. Šváby, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: Romanian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0258

Topics

Charter of Fundamental Rights Principles of Union law Social policy

History · 1 version

13 Jun 2017Reading

Connections

Interprets 4: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation
Cited by 23: CG v The Department for Communities in Northern Ireland (C-709/20); BPC Lux 2 Sàrl and Others v Banco de Portugal and Others (C-83/20); 'Trade Express-L' OOD and 'DEVNIA TSIMENT' AD v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia 'Darzhaven rezerv i voennovremenni zapasi' (C-395/22); Terveys- ja sosiaalialan neuvottelujärjestö (TSN) ry v Hyvinvointialan liitto ry and Auto- ja Kuljetusalan Työntekijäliitto AKT ry v Satamaoperaattorit ry (C-609/17, C-610/17); Asociaţia 'Forumul Judecătorilor din România' and Others v Inspecţia Judiciară and Others (C-83/19, C-127/19, C-195/19, C-291/19, C-355/19, C-397/19); Banco Santander, SA v J.A.C. and M.C.P.R (C-410/20); UX v Governo della Repubblica italiana (C-658/18)2 provisions; FE v European Parliament (T-483/24); T.T. and BAJI Trans, s.r. o. v Národný inšpektorát práce (C-544/23); FG v European Commission (T-495/24); Giacomo Santini and Others v European Parliament (C-198/21 P); Enrico Falqui v European Parliament (C-391/21 P); Maria Teresa Coppo Gavazzi and Others v European Parliament (C-725/20 P); PH v Regione Autonoma Friuli Venezia Giulia and Direzione centrale risorse agroalimentari, forestali e ittiche - Servizio foreste e corpo forestale della Regione Autonoma Friuli Venezia Giulia (C-24/21); 'Sātiņi-S' SIA (C-238/20); 'Sātiņi-S' SIA (C-234/20); F.C.I. v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) (C-244/20); Enrico Falqui v European Parliament (T-695/19); BT v Balgarska Narodna Banka (C-501/18)2 provisions; Giacomo Santini and Others v European Parliament (T-345/19); Mario Forte v European Parliament (T-519/19); Maria Teresa Coppo Gavazzi and Others v European Parliament (T-389/19, T-465/19); YS v NK (C-223/19)
Cites 17: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation; Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (C-402/05); Åklagaren v Hans Åkerberg Fransson (C-617/10); Sindicatul Cadrelor Militare Disponibilizate în rezervă și în retragere (SCMD) v Ministerul Finanțelor Publice (C-262/14); Eugenia Florescu and Others v Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Sibiu and Others (C-258/14); 2009/458/EC: Council Decision of 6 May 2009 granting mutual assistance for Romania; 2009/459/EC: Council Decision of 6 May 2009 providing Community medium-term financial assistance for Romania; Pubblico Ministero v Flavia Manghera and others (59/75); Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 of 18 February 2002 establishing a facility providing medium-term financial assistance for Member States' balances of payments; French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-57/95); Friesland Coberco Dairy Foods BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane Noord/kantoor Groningen (C-11/05); Salvatore Grimaldi v Fonds des maladies professionnelles (C-322/88); N. S. v Secretary of State for the Home Department and M. E. and Others v Refugee Applications Commissioner and Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (C-411/10, C-493/10); Ledra Advertising Ltd and Others v European Commission and European Central Bank (ECB) (C-8/15 P, C-9/15 P, C-10/15 P)