Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
InnoLux Corp. v European Commission (C-231/14 P)
Judgment
The application to reopen the oral pro…
26

InnoLux Corp. v European Commission (C-231/14 P)

Judgment of 9 Jul 2015law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-231-14/para_26@2026-11-10

26It must be borne in mind that the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Rules of Procedure of the Court make no provision for the parties to submit observations in response to the Advocate General’s Opinion (see judgment in Vnuk, C‑162/13, EU:C:2014:2146, paragraph 30 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-231/14 P · ECLI:EU:C:2015:451
Decided: 9 Jul 2015
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: InnoLux Corp
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: A.Ó Caoimh
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, A.Ó Caoimh, C. Toader, E. Jarašiūnas, C.G. Fernlund
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0231

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

9 Jul 2015Reading

Connections

Cited by 20: Intel Corporation Inc. v European Commission (T-1129/23); Crédit agricole SA and Others v European Commission (T-386/21); Conserve Italia - Consorzio Italiano fra cooperative agricole Soc. coop. agr. and Conserves France v European Commission (T-59/22); Crédit agricole SA and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v European Commission (T-113/17); Productos Ibéricos Calderón y Ramos, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-384/22); Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission (C-666/19 P)2 provisions; Société Air France v European Commission (T-338/17); Air France-KLM v European Commission (T-337/17); Nichicon Corporation v European Commission (T-342/18); Gazdasági Versenyhivatal v Budapest Bank Nyrt. and Others (C-228/18); LG Electronics, Inc. and Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v European Commission (C-588/15 P, C-622/15 P); Samsung SDI Co. Ltd and Samsung SDI (Malaysia) Bhd v European Commission (C-615/15); Timab Industries and Cie financière et de participations Roullier (CFPR) v European Commission (C-411/15 P); European Commission v Aer Lingus Ltd and Ryanair Designated Activity Company (C-164/15 P, C-165/15 P); H. Lundbeck A/S and Lundbeck Ltd v European Commission (T-472/13)2 provisions; Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission (C-101/15 P); SKW Stahl-Metallurgie GmbH and SKW Stahl-Metallurgie Holding AG v European Commission (C-154/14 P); Tarif Akhras v Council of the European Union (C-193/15 P); Panasonic Corp. and MT Picture Display Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-82/13)2 provisions; Toshiba Corp. v European Commission (T-104/13)
Cites 23: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Guardian Industries Corp. and Guardian Europe Sàrl v European Commission (C-580/12 P); A. Ahlström Osakeyhtiö and others v Commission of the European Communities (89/85, 104/85, 114/85, 116/85, 117/85, 125/85, 126/85, 127/85, 128/85, 129/85); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (100/80, 101/80, 102/80, 103/80); Arkema SA v European Commission (C-520/09 P); SGL Carbon AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-308/04); Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole Fresh Fruit Europe v European Commission (C-286/13 P); Team Relocations NV and Others v European Commission (C-444/11); Alliance One International Inc., formerly Standard Commercial Corp., and Standard Commercial Tobacco Co. Inc. v European Commission and European Commission v Alliance One International Inc. and Others (C-628/10 P, C-14/11 P); Showa Denko KK v Commission of the European Communities (C-289/04); InnoLux Corp. v European Commission (T-91/11); Britannia Alloys & Chemicals Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-76/06 P); Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Triglav d.d (C-162/13)2 provisions; LG Display Co. Ltd and LG Display Taiwan Co. Ltd v European Commission (C-227/14 P); European Commission v Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Srl and Parker-Hannifin Corp (C-434/13 P); Hydrotherm Gerätebau GmbH v Compact del Dott. Ing. Mario Andreoli & C. Sas (170/83); Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Nordzucker AG (C-148/14); (publication by extracts) LG Display Co. Ltd and LG Display Taiwan Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-128/11); Istituto Chemioterapico Italiano S.p.A. and Commercial Solvents Corporation v Commission of the European Communities (C-6/73, C-7/73); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); E.ON Energie AG v European Commission (C-89/11 P); NV Koninklijke KNP BT v Commission of the European Communities (C-248/98 P)