Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
LG Display Co. Ltd and LG Display Taiwan Co. Ltd v European Commission (C-227/14 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The first ground of appeal: taking int…
Findings of the Court
62

LG Display Co. Ltd and LG Display Taiwan Co. Ltd v European Commission (C-227/14 P)

Judgment of 23 Apr 2015law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-227-14/para_62@2026-11-11

62Moreover, the very fact that an undertaking achieves sales on the relevant market to independent third parties at such increased prices entails a distortion of competition affecting the entire relevant market, to the disadvantage, in particular, of consumers.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Eighth Chamber
Case: C-227/14 P · ECLI:EU:C:2015:258
Decided: 23 Apr 2015
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicants: LG Display Co. Ltd; LG Display Taiwan Co. Ltd
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: A. Ó Caoimh
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 3 judges
A. Ó Caoimh, C. Toader, C.G. Fernlund
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0227

Topics

History · 1 version

23 Apr 2015Reading

Connections

Cited by 23: Zenith Media Communications SRL v Consiliul Concurenţei (C-385/21); Air France-KLM v European Commission (T-337/17); Société Air France v European Commission (T-338/17); Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v European Commission (T-343/17); Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission (T-325/17); Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-340/17)2 provisions; Latam Airlines Group SA and Lan Cargo SA v European Commission (T-344/17); Nichicon Corporation v European Commission (T-342/18); Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation v European Commission (T-363/18); Recylex SA and Others v European Commission (C-563/19 P); Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. and Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea, Inc. v European Commission (T-1/16); Recylex SA and Others v European Commission (T-222/17); Slovak Telekom, a.s. v European Commission (T-851/14); Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission (T-827/14); Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission (C-99/17 P); Furukawa Electric Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-444/14); Viscas Corp. v European Commission (T-422/14); Fujikura Ltd v European Commission (T-451/14); Infineon Technologies AG v European Commission (T-758/14); Xellia Pharmaceuticals ApS and Alpharma, LLC, formerly Zoetis Products LLC v European Commission (T-471/13); Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission (C-101/15 P); Portugal Telecom SGPS, SA v European Commission (T-208/13)2 provisions; Telefónica, SA v European Commission (T-216/13)
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Guardian Industries Corp. and Guardian Europe Sàrl v European Commission (C-580/12 P); Denki Kagaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha and Denka Chemicals GmbH v European Commission (T-83/08); Britannia Alloys & Chemicals Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-76/06 P); Team Relocations NV and Amertranseuro International Holdings Ltd, Trans Euro Ltd and Team Relocations Ltd v European Commission (T-204/08, T-212/08); Tomra Systems ASA and Others v European Commission (C-549/10 P); IMI plc, IMI Kynoch Ltd and Yorkshire Copper Tube v European Commission (T-18/05); BASF AG and UCB SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-101/05, T-111/05); JCB Service v Commission of the European Communities (C-167/04 P); (publication by extracts) LG Display Co. Ltd and LG Display Taiwan Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-128/11); Kuwait Petroleum Corp. and Others v European Commission (C-581/12); Dansk Rørindustri A/S v Commission of the European Communities (T-21/99); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (100/80, 101/80, 102/80, 103/80); Archer Daniels Midland Co. and Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-397/03); Transcatab SpA v European Commission (T-39/06); Team Relocations NV and Others v European Commission (C-444/11)