Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Rusal Armenal ZAO (C-21/14 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The second ground of appeal, alleging…
Findings of the Court
45

European Commission v Rusal Armenal ZAO (C-21/14 P)

Judgment of 16 Jul 2015law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-21-14/para_45@2026-11-10

45However, in order for such an exception to be allowed in a specific case, it must also be established, to the requisite legal standard, that the legislature has shown the intention to implement in EU law a particular obligation assumed in the context of the WTO agreements.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-21/14 P · ECLI:EU:C:2015:494
Decided: 16 Jul 2015
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62009TJ0512
Applicants: European Commission; Rusal Armenal ZAO
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: J.L. da Cruz Vilaça
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 15 judges
V. Skouris, K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, M. Ilešič, L. Bay Larsen, K. Jürimäe, A. Rosas, E. Juhász, A. Borg Barthet, M. Safjan, D. Šváby, M. Berger, A. Prechal, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, C. Lycourgos
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0021

Topics

History · 1 version

16 Jul 2015Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Rusal Armenal ZAO v Council of the European Union (T-512/09)
Cited by 20: Robin Wood - Gewaltfreie Aktionsgemeinschaft für Natur und Umwelt eV and Others v European Commission (T-575/22); Hengshi Egypt Fiberglass Fabrics SAE and Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry SAE v European Commission (C-269/23 P)2 provisions; European Union Intellectual Property Office v The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR (C-382/21 P); Anhui Wanwei Updated High-Tech Material Industry Co. Ltd and Inner Mongolia Mengwei Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-764/20); Inner Mongolia Shuangxin Environment-Friendly Material Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-763/20); Sinopec Chongqing SVW Chemical Co. Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-762/20); Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission (C-123/21 P)3 provisions; Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co. Ltd v European Commission (C-718/20 P); European Commission and GMB Glasmanufaktur Brandenburg GmbH v Xinyi PV Products (Anhui) Holdings Ltd (C-884/19 P); Acron PAO and Others v European Commission (T-45/19); Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-541/18); Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-307/18); Zhejiang Jndia Pipeline Industry Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-228/17)3 provisions; Foshan Lihua Ceramic Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-310/16); Skatteministeriet v Baby Dan A/S (C-592/17); Rotho Blaas Srl v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli (C-207/17); Canadian Solar Emea GmbH and Others v Council of the European Union (T-162/14); Yingli Energy (China) Co. Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union (T-160/14); JingAo Solar Co. Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union (T-157/14); Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-424/13)
Cites 12: Fabbrica italiana accumulatori motocarri Montecchio SpA (FIAMM) and Fabbrica italiana accumulatori motocarri Montecchio Technologies LLC, Giorgio Fedon & Figli SpA and Fedon America, Inc. v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (C-120/06); Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community; Nakajima All Precision Co. Ltd v Council of the European Communities (C-69/89); Petrotub SA and Republica SA v Council of the European Union (C-76/00 P); Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (Codified version); Council of the European Union and Others v Vereniging Milieudefensie and Stichting Stop Luchtverontreiniging Utrecht (C-401/12 P, C-402/12 P, C-403/12 P); Fédération de l'industrie de l'huilerie de la CEE (Fediol) v Commission of the European Communities (70/87); Léon Van Parys NV v Belgisch Interventie- en Restitutiebureau (BIRB) (C-377/02); Établissements Biret et Cie SA v Council of the European Union (C-94/02 P); LVP NV v Belgische Staat (C-306/13); Council Regulation (EC) No 2238/2000 of 9 October 2000 amending Regulation (EC) No 384/96 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community; Portuguese Republic v Council of the European Union (C-149/96)