Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
AC-Treuhand AG v European Commission (C-194/14 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The third ground of appeal, alleging i…
Findings of the Court
65

AC-Treuhand AG v European Commission (C-194/14 P)

Judgment of 22 Oct 2015law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-194-14/para_65@2026-11-11

65However, point 37 of the 2006 Guidelines states that ‘[a]lthough these Guidelines present the general methodology for the setting of fines, the particularities of a given case or the need to achieve deterrence in a particular case may justify departing from such methodology.’

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-194/14 P · ECLI:EU:C:2015:717
Decided: 22 Oct 2015
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: AC‑Treuhand AG
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: J.L. da Cruz Vilaça
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, A. Arabadjiev, C. Lycourgos, J.-C. Bonichot
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0194

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

22 Oct 2015Reading

Connections

Cited by 17: Criminal proceedings against BV (C-570/20); UBS Group AG, venant aux droits de Credit Suisse Group AG and Others v European Commission (T-84/22); Crédit agricole SA and Others v European Commission (T-386/21); Mylan Laboratories Ltd and Mylan, Inc. v European Commission (C-197/19); Servier SAS and Others v European Commission (C-201/19 P); Lupin Ltd v European Commission (C-144/19); Biogaran SAS v European Commission (C-207/19); JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Others v European Commission (T-106/17); Altice Group Lux Sàrl v European Commission (C-746/21 P); Clariant AG and Clariant International AG v European Commission (T-590/20)2 provisions; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and Cephalon Inc. v European Commission (T-74/21)2 provisions; Valve Corporation v European Commission (T-172/21); European Commission and Interessengemeinschaft der Grenzhändler (IGG) v Dansk Erhverv (C-508/21 P); Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-340/17)7 provisions; Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission (T-350/17); Air France-KLM v European Commission (T-337/17); Société Air France v European Commission (T-338/17)
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Schindler Holding Ltd and Others v European Commission (C-501/11 P); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); Aalborg Portland A/S, Irish Cement Ltd, Ciments français SA, Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA, Buzzi Unicem SpA and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P, C-219/00 P); Telefónica SA and Telefónica de España SAU v European Commission (C-295/12 P); Evonik Degussa GmbH v Commission of the European Communities and the Council of the European Union (C-266/06); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (100/80, 101/80, 102/80, 103/80); AC-Treuhand AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-99/04); Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon v European Commission (C-386/10 P); ACF Chemiefarma NV v Commission of the European Communities (41/69); T-Mobile Netherlands BV, KPN Mobile NV, Orange Nederland NV and Vodafone Libertel NV v Raad van bestuur van de Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit (C-8/08); Établissements Consten S.à.R.L. and Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH v Commission of the European Economic Community (C-56/64, C-58/64); Société Technique Minière (L.T.M.) v Maschinenbau Ulm GmbH (M.B.U.) (56/65); Javico International and Javico AG v Yves Saint Laurent Parfums SA (YSLP) (C-306/96); Commission of the European Communities v Volkswagen AG (C-74/04); Commission of the European Communities v Anic Partecipazioni SpA (C-49/92 P); AC-Treuhand AG v European Commission (T-27/10); LG Display Co. Ltd and LG Display Taiwan Co. Ltd v European Commission (C-227/14 P); European Commission v Parker Hannifin Manufacturing Srl and Parker-Hannifin Corp (C-434/13 P); SA Binon & Cie v SA Agence et messageries de la presse (243/83)