46It follows from all the foregoing considerations that the General Court was correct to find, at paragraphs 43 and 44 of the judgment under appeal, that AC‑Treuhand’s conduct was caught by the prohibition laid down in Article 81(1) EC and that that interpretation could reasonably have been foreseen at the time the infringements were committed.
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.