Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Hungary (C-179/14)
Judgment
The action
The complaints concerning the conditio…
Findings of the Court
–Substance
152

European Commission v Hungary (C-179/14)

Judgment of 23 Feb 2016law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-179-14/para_152@2026-11-11

152As the Court has recalled on a number of occasions, the concept of services may not be interpreted restrictively (see to that effect, inter alia, judgment in Deliège, C‑51/96 and C‑191/97, EU:C:2000:199, paragraph 52 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-179/14 · ECLI:EU:C:2016:108
Decided: 23 Feb 2016
Procedure: Infringement action
Applicant: European Commission
Defendant: Hungary
Rapporteur: A. Prechal
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 13 judges
K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, M. Ilešič, L. Bay Larsen, D. Šváby, F. Biltgen, C. Lycourgos, A. Rosas, E. Juhász, M. Safjan, M. Berger, A. Prechal, K. Jürimäe
Language: Hungarian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0179

Topics

Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services Internal market - Principles

History · 1 version

23 Feb 2016Reading

Connections

Cited by 16: Anonymi Geniki Etairia Tsimenton Iraklis (AGET Iraklis) v Ypourgos Ergasias, Koinonikis Asfalisis kai Koinonikis Allilengyis (C-201/15); European Commission v Hungary (C-66/18); INTERZERO Trajnostne rešitve za svet brez odpadkov d.o.o. and Others and Surovina, družba za predelavo odpadkov d.o.o. and Others (C-254/23); European Commission v Hellenic Republic (C-729/17); Memoria Srl and Antonia Dall'Antonia v Comune di Padova (C-342/17); European Commission v Ireland (C-552/15); SIA „KOB” v Madonas novada pašvaldības Administratīvo aktu strīdu komisija (C-206/19); Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab Afdeling Schackenborgvænge and Others v MV and Others (C-417/23); Bursa Română de Mărfuri SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Reglementare în domeniul Energiei i (ANRE) (C-394/21); Asociación Estatal de Entidades de Servicios de Atención a Domicilio (ASADE) v Consejería de Igualdad y Políticas Inclusivas (C-436/20); European Commission v Hungary (C-171/17); ‘TTL’ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ - Sofia (C-553/16); Alphonse Eschenbrenner v Bundesagentur für Arbeit (C-496/15); Betriebsrat der Ruhrlandklinik gGmbH v Ruhrlandklinik gGmbH (C-216/15); European Commission v Czech Republic (C-525/14); État belge, SPF Finances v NN (L) International (C-48/15)
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Directive 2006/123/EC; Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others v Rina Services SpA and Others (C-593/13); OSA — Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně a.s (C-351/12); Fédération des maisons de repos privées de Belgique (Femarbel) ASBL v Commission communautaire commune de Brussels-Capitale (C-57/12); Société fiduciaire nationale d’expertise comptable v Ministre du Budget, des Comptes publics et de la Fonction publique (C-119/09); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-439/99); Liga Portuguesa de Futebol Profissional and Bwin International Ltd v Departamento de Jogos da Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa (C-42/07); Hans-Dieter Jundt and Hedwig Jundt v Finanzamt Offenburg (C-281/06); Her Majesty's Customs and Excise v Gerhart Schindler and Jörg Schindler (C-275/92); Berlington Hungary Tanácsadó és Szolgáltató kft and Others v Magyar Állam (C-98/14); Questore di Verona v Diego Zenatti (C-67/98); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-317/13, C-679/13); Portugaia Construções Ldª (C-164/99); Cadbury Schweppes plc and Cadbury Schweppes Overseas Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (C-196/04); Markus Stoß, Avalon Service-Online-Dienste GmbH and Olaf Amadeus Wilhelm Happel v Wetteraukreis and Kulpa Automatenservice Asperg GmbH, SOBO Sport & Entertainment GmbH and Andreas Kunert v Land Baden-Württemberg (C-316/07, C-358/07, C-359/07, C-360/07, C-409/07, C-410/07); Christelle Deliège v Ligue francophone de judo et disciplines associées ASBL, Ligue belge de judo ASBL, Union européenne de judo and François Pacquée (C-51/96, C-191/97)2 provisions; Reinhard Gebhard v Consiglio dell'Ordine degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano (C-55/94); Carmen Media Group Ltd v Land Schleswig-Holstein and Innenminister des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (C-46/08); Rolf Dieter Danner (C-136/00); Markku Juhani Läärä, Cotswold Microsystems Ltd and Oy Transatlantic Software Ltd v Kihlakunnansyyttäjä (Jyväskylä) and Suomen valtio (Finnish State) (C-124/97)