Judgment_paragraph 32 · ING Pensii, Societate de Administrare a unui Fond de Pensii Administrat Privat SA v Consiliul Concurenței (C-172/14)

32It is established case-law that agreements whose object, as will be apparent from the very nature of such agreements, is to share customers for services constitute forms of collusion that are particularly injurious to the proper functioning of normal competition. Accordingly, agreements to share customers, like agreements on prices, clearly form part of the category of the most serious restrictions of competition (see, to that effect, judgment in Commission v Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje, C‑440/11 P, EU:C:2013:514, paragraphs 95 and 111).