Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Andrejs Surmačs v Finanšu un kapitāla tirgus komisija (C-127/14)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question
21

Andrejs Surmačs v Finanšu un kapitāla tirgus komisija (C-127/14)

Judgment of 2 Sept 2015law://eu/cjeu/2014/c-127-14/para_21@2026-11-12

21Finally, it is clear from the first recital in the preamble to Directive 94/19 that it has the dual objective of protecting savers in the event of the unavailability of deposits made in credit institutions and of increasing the stability of the banking system.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-127/14 · ECLI:EU:C:2015:522
Decided: 2 Sept 2015
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Augstākā Tiesa (Latvia)
Applicant: Andrejs Surmačs
Defendant: Finanšu un kapitāla tirgus komisija
Rapporteur: J.L. da Cruz Vilaça
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, C. Lycourgos
Language: Latvian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62014CJ0127

Topics

Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

2 Sept 2015Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes
Cited by 8: Criminal proceedings against IS (C-564/19); T GmbH v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Spittal an der Drau (C-671/22); Proceedings brought by Oulun Sähkönmyynti Oy (C-294/18); Tecnoservice Int. Srl, in liquidation v Poste Italiane SpA (C-245/18); Bundeskammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte v ING-DiBa Direktbank Austria Niederlassung der ING-DiBa AG (C-191/17); Paul Vervloet and Others v Ministerraad (C-76/15)2 provisions; DHL Express (Austria) GmbH v Post-Control-Kommission and Bundesminister für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie (C-2/15); Christian Liffers v Producciones Mandarina SL and Mediaset España Comunicación SA, anciennement Gestevisión Telecinco SA (C-99/15)
Cites 6: Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-583/11 P); Ministero dell’Interno v Fastweb SpA (C-19/13); Charlotte Rosselle v Institut national d'assurance maladie-invalidité (INAMI) and Union nationale des mutualités libres (UNM) (C-65/14); Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on deposit guarantee schemes (recast) Text with EEA relevance; Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes; Andrejs Surmačs v Finanšu un kapitāla tirgus komisija (C-127/14)