Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-424/13)
Judgment
Law
The first plea in law
Preliminary observations
97

Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-424/13)

Judgment of 30 Jun 2016law://eu/cjeu/2013/t-424-13/para_97@2026-11-10

97In the first place, the purpose of Article 6(7) and Article 20 of the basic regulation, which correspond, in essence, to the provisions of Article 6.4 and 6.9 of the Anti-dumping Agreement, is to define the procedural guarantees guaranteeing the interested parties’ right to information.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Eighth Chamber
Case: T-424/13 · ECLI:EU:T:2016:378
Decided: 30 Jun 2016
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: D. Gratsias
Bench: 3 judges
D. Gratsias, M. Kancheva, C. Wetter
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013TJ0424

Topics

Common commercial policy

History · 1 version

30 Jun 2016Reading

Connections

Cited by 18: UU v Court of Justice of the European Union (T-84/24); PT Musim Mas v European Commission (T-176/23); Arkema France v European Commission (T-165/23); China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products (CCCME) and Others v European Commission (T-263/22); Çolakoğlu Metalurji AŞ and Çolakoğlu Dış Ticaret AŞ v European Commission (T-630/21); Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları TAŞ and Others v European Commission (T-629/21); Sinopec Chongqing SVW Chemical Co. Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-762/20); Anhui Wanwei Updated High-Tech Material Industry Co. Ltd and Inner Mongolia Mengwei Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-764/20); Inner Mongolia Shuangxin Environment-Friendly Material Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-763/20); Kingdom of Cambodia and Cambodia Rice Federation (CRF) v European Commission (T-246/19); Zhejiang Hangtong Machinery Manufacture Co. Ltd and Ningbo Hi-Tech Zone Tongcheng Auto Parts Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-278/20); China Rubber Industry Association (CRIA) and China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (CCCMC) v European Commission (T-30/19); Novolipetsk Steel PAO v European Commission (T-790/19); Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) v European Commission (T-752/16); PAO Severstal v European Commission (T-753/16); China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v European Commission (T-254/18)8 provisions; Acron PAO and Others v European Commission (T-45/19); Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-650/17)
Cites 25: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); European Commission v Moravia Gas Storage a.s (C-596/13 P); Varec SA v Belgian State (C-450/06); European Commission v Italian Republic (C-297/08); Ziegler SA v European Commission (C-439/11 P); Crown Equipment (Suzhou) Co. Ltd and Crown Gabelstapler GmbH & Co. KG v Council of the European Union (T-643/11); North Drilling Co. v Council of the European Union (T-552/12); Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities v Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT (Interpipe Niko Tube ZAT) and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT (Interpipe NTRP VAT) (C-191/09 P, C-200/09 P); Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie ferrosplavy OAO (KF) v Council of the European Union (T-190/08); Whirlpool Europe Srl v Council of the European Union (T-314/06); Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT (Interpipe Niko Tube ZAT) and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT (Interpipe NTRP VAT) v Council of the European Union (T-249/06); Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-310/12); Nakajima All Precision Co. Ltd v Council of the European Communities (C-69/89); Hangzhou Duralamp Electronics Co., Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-459/07); Foshan Shunde Yongjian Housewares & Hardware Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (C-141/08); Solvay SA v European Commission (C-110/10 P); European Commission v Rusal Armenal ZAO (C-21/14 P); T-Mobile Netherlands BV, KPN Mobile NV, Orange Nederland NV and Vodafone Libertel NV v Raad van bestuur van de Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit (C-8/08); HEG Ltd and Graphite India Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-462/04); Petrotub SA and Republica SA v Council of the European Union (C-76/00 P); Commission Regulation (EU) No 1071/2012 of 14 November 2012 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in the People's Republic of China and Thailand; Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (Codified version); Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 430/2013 of 13 May 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in the People’s Republic of China and Thailand and terminating the proceeding with regard to Indonesia; Wolfgang Glatzel v Freistaat Bayern (C-356/12); Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Commission (C-398/13 P)