Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Portugal Telecom SGPS, SA v European Commission (T-208/13)
Judgment
Law
B –Substance
3. The request for the examination of…
280

Portugal Telecom SGPS, SA v European Commission (T-208/13)

Judgment of 28 Jun 2016law://eu/cjeu/2013/t-208-13/para_280@2026-11-11

280It must be pointed out that the Court is the sole judge of whether the information available to it concerning the cases before it needs to be supplemented (see order of 10 June 2010, Thomson Sales Europe v Commission, C‑498/09 P, EU:C:2010:338, paragraph 138 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Second Chamber
Case: T-208/13 · ECLI:EU:T:2016:368
Decided: 28 Jun 2016
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Portugal Telecom SGPS, SA
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: M.E. Martins Ribeiro
Bench: 3 judges
M.E. Martins Ribeiro, S. Gervasoni, L. Madise
Language: Portuguese
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013TJ0208

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

28 Jun 2016Reading

Connections

Cited by 2: Pharol, SGPS, SA v European Commission (T-181/22)24 provisions; Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd v European Commission (T-343/17)
Cites 23: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive); Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Guardian Industries Corp. and Guardian Europe Sàrl v European Commission (C-580/12 P); Elf Aquitaine SA v European Commission (C-521/09 P); MasterCard Inc. and Others v European Commission (C-382/12 P); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P); Mag Instrument Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-136/02 P); Honeywell International, Inc. v Commission of the European Communities (T-209/01); Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-404/04); Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (C-197/99 P); Telefónica SA and Telefónica de España SAU v European Commission (C-295/12 P); Dalmine SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-50/00); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (100/80, 101/80, 102/80, 103/80); France Télécom SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-340/03); Chalkor AE Epexergasias Metallon v European Commission (C-386/10 P); Siemens AG and Others v European Commission (C-239/11); French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-17/99); Remia BV and others v Commission of the European Communities (42/84); ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs NV and Others v European Commission (T-144/07); Asia Motor France SA, Jean-Michel Cesbron, Monin automobiles SA and Europe auto services (EAS) SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-154/98)