Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Maria Concetta Cerafogli v European Central Bank (T-114/13 P)
Judgment
The appeal
35

Maria Concetta Cerafogli v European Central Bank (T-114/13 P)

Judgment of 23 Sept 2015law://eu/cjeu/2013/t-114-13/para_35@2026-11-10

35The adversarial principle applies to all proceedings that may lead to a decision of a EU institution which has an appreciable effect on the interests of a person (see, to that effect, judgment of 2 December 2009 in Commission v Ireland and Others, C‑89/08 P, ECR, EU:C:2009:742, paragraph 50).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Appeals Chamber
Case: T-114/13 P · ECLI:EU:T:2015:678
Decided: 23 Sept 2015
Procedure: staff cases
Ruled invalid: 62010FJ0043
Applicant: Maria Concetta Cerafogli
Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB)
Rapporteur: S. Frimodt Nielsen
Bench: 3 judges
M. Jaeger, A. Dittrich, S. Frimodt Nielsen
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013TJ0114

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

23 Sept 2015Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Maria Concetta Cerafogli v European Central Bank (ECB) (F-43/10)
Cited by 20: CU v European External Action Service (T-145/24); HF v European Parliament (T-565/22); PV v European Commission (T-89/20); BZ v European Central Bank (T-162/21); PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank (T-230/20); Trasta Komercbanka AS and Others v European Central Bank (T-698/16); Finanziaria d'investimento Fininvest SpA (Fininvest) and Silvio Berlusconi v European Central Bank (T-913/16); Pilatus Bank plc and Pilatus Holding ltd. v European Central Bank (T-27/19); HF v European Parliament (C-570/18 P)2 provisions; Maria Concetta Cerafogli v European Central Bank (T-483/16); PT v European Investment Bank (T-573/16); PT v European Investment Bank (T-571/16); CN v European Parliament (T-76/18); CH v European Parliament (T-83/18); HF v European Parliament (T-218/17)3 provisions; HF v European Parliament (T-570/16)3 provisions; GV v European External Action Service (F-137/14); Stéphane De Loecker v European External Action Service (F-34/15); Maria Concetta Cerafogli v European Central Bank (ECB) (F-26/12); Marie Tzirani v European Commission (F-46/11)
Cites 9: Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data; European Commission v Ireland and Others (C-89/08); Carina Skareby v European Commission (F-42/10); M. G. and N. R. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-383/13 PPU); Der Grüne Punkt - Duales System Deutschland GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-385/07); Sopropé - Organizações de Calçado Lda v Fazenda Pública (C-349/07); Jiří Sabou v Finanční ředitelství pro hlavní město Prahu (C-276/12); Maria Concetta Cerafogli v European Central Bank (ECB) (F-43/10); IFAW Internationaler Tierschutz-Fonds gGmbH v European Commission (C-135/11 P)