Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
CQ v European Parliament (F-12/13)
Judgment
Law
Substance
The first plea, alleging manifest erro…
81

CQ v European Parliament (F-12/13)

Judgment of 17 Sept 2014law://eu/cjeu/2013/f-12-13/para_81@2026-11-10

81In support of that plea, the applicant alleges various facts identified by her as constituting, both individually and jointly, psychological harassment and that should be examined as the basis of the corresponding complaints made in the context of that plea.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Civil Service Tribunal · Third Chamber
Case: F-12/13 · ECLI:EU:F:2014:214
Decided: 17 Sept 2014
Procedure: staff cases unfounded
Applicant: CQ
Defendant: European Parliament
Rapporteur: J. Svenningsen
Bench: 3 judges
S. Van Raepenbusch, E. Perillo, J. Svenningsen
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013FJ0012

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

17 Sept 2014Reading

Connections

Cited by 24: PS v European External Action Service (T-594/23); LU v European Investment Bank (T-365/24); DI v European Parliament (T-173/24); OC v European External Action Service (T-770/21); QN v European Commission (T-179/21); MW v European Parliament (T-630/20); VP v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (T-187/18); Maria Concetta Cerafogli v European Central Bank (T-483/16); PV v European Commission (T-786/16); ZQ v European Commission (T-647/18); DQ and Others v European Parliament (T-730/18); FV v Council of the European Union (T-27/18); XI v European Commission (T-528/18); CH v European Parliament (T-83/18); CN v European Parliament (T-76/18); Michela Curto v European Parliament (T-275/17); SQ v European Investment Bank (T-377/17)2 provisions; HF v European Parliament (T-218/17); HQ v Community Plant Variety Office (T-592/16); CW v European Parliament (T-742/16); CW v European Parliament (T-309/15); FV v Council of the European Union (F-40/15); FS v European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) (F-102/15); CH v European Parliament (F-132/14)
Cites 18: Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials); François Vainker v European Parliament (C-293/87); European Commission v Q (T-80/09); Christos Michail v European Commission (T-486/04); Riccardo Achille Menghi v European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) (F-2/09); Marie Tzirani v European Commission (F-46/11); Manel Camós Grau v European Commission (T-309/03); Carmela Lo Giudice v European Commission (T-154/05); Carina Skareby v European Commission (F-42/10); Vahan Adjemian and Others v European Commission (T-325/09 P); Nadine Schmit v Commission of the European Communities (T-144/03); N v European Parliament (F-26/09); K v European Parliament (F-15/07); Nicola Cantisani v European Commission (F-71/10); AN v European Commission (F-111/10); Alain-Pierre Allo v European Commission (T-496/93); Christos Michail v European Commission (F-34/06); Q v Commission of the European Communities (F-52/05)