Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Mediaset SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo economico (C-69/13)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question
19

Mediaset SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo economico (C-69/13)

Judgment of 13 Feb 2014law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-69-13/para_19@2026-11-10

19In that regard, it must be borne in mind that the implementation of that system of control is a matter for both the Commission and the national courts, their respective roles being complementary but separate (see Case C-284/12 Deutsche Lufthansa [2013] ECR, paragraph 27 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-69/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2014:71
Decided: 13 Feb 2014
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Tribunale civile di Roma (Italy)
Applicant: Mediaset SpA
Defendant: Ministero dello Sviluppo economico
Rapporteur: A. Arabadjiev
Advocate General: N. Jääskinen
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, G. Arestis, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0069

Topics

History · 1 version

13 Feb 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)
Cited by 24: Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (C-362/14); Congregación de Escuelas Pías Provincia Betania v Ayuntamiento de Getafe (C-74/16); Rems Kargins v European Commission (T-350/23); Scai Srl v Regione Campania (C-588/23); Administradora Fortaleza Ltda and Others v European Commission (T-716/22); Aluminios Cortizo, SAU and Cortizo Cartera, SL v European Commission (T-1/14); Decal España, SA v European Commission (T-509/14); Naturgy Energy Group, SA, formerly Gas Natural SDG, SA v European Commission (T-508/14); Duro Felguera, SA and Others v European Commission (T-401/14); Caixabank, SA and Others v European Commission (T-700/13); Hispavima, SL v European Commission (T-514/14); Grupo Morera & Vallejo, SL and DSA, Defensa y Servicios del Asegurado, SA v European Commission (T-519/14); Telefónica Gestión Integral de Edificios y Servicios, SL, formerly Taetel, SL and Banco Santander, SA, formerly Banco Popular Español, SA v European Commission (T-29/14); TS and HI v Ministar na zemedelieto, hranite i gorite (C-325/22); Região Autónoma da Madeira v European Commission (T-131/21); Sicilia Regionale Marittima SpA - Siremar v European Commission (T-668/21); Portuguese Republic v European Commission (T-95/21); Fossil (Gibraltar) Limited v Commissioner of Income Tax (C-705/20); JCDecaux Street Furniture Belgium v European Commission (T-642/19); Dansk Erhverv v European Commission (T-47/19); Fortischem a.s. v European Commission (T-121/15); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-314/15); Fondul Proprietatea SA v Complexul Energetic Oltenia SA (C-150/16)2 provisions; Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia and Redes de Telecomunicación Galegas Retegal, SA (Retegal) v European Commission (T-463/13)
Cites 16: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Albako Margarinefabrik Maria von der Linde GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesanstalt für landwirtschaftliche Marktordnung (C-249/85); France Télécom SA v European Commission (C-81/10 P); Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty; Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-209/00); Mediaset SpA v European Commission (T-177/07); Deutsche Lufthansa AG v Flughafen Frankfurt-Hahn GmbH (C-284/12); Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities (C-382/99); Transalpine Ölleitung in Österreich GmbH and Others v Finanzlandesdirektion für Tirol and Others (C-368/04); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-480/98); Belgische Staat v Eugène Van Calster and Felix Cleeren and Openbaar Slachthuis NV (C-261/01, C-262/01); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (C-404/00); Sicilcassa SpA v IRA Costruzioni SpA and Francesco Gaetano Restivo Graci and Others and Francesco Gaetano Restivo Graci and Others v IRA Costruzioni SpA, Amministrazione straordinaria della Holding personale Graci Gaetano and Sicilcassa SpA (C-297/01); 2007/374/EC: Commission Decision of 24 January 2007 on State aid C 52/2005 (ex NN 88/2005, ex CP 101/2004) implemented by the Italian Republic for the subsidised purchase of digital decoders (notified under document number C(2006) 6634) (Text with EEA relevance); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-310/99)