Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
OTP Bank Nyrt. v Magyar Állam and Magyar Államkincstár (C-672/13)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
Preliminary observations
36

OTP Bank Nyrt. v Magyar Állam and Magyar Államkincstár (C-672/13)

Judgment of 19 Mar 2015law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-672-13/para_36@2026-11-10

36Under that system of supervision, the Commission and the national courts have different powers and responsibilities (judgment in Namur-Les assurances du crédit, C‑44/93, EU:C:1994:311, paragraph 14).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Sixth Chamber
Case: C-672/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2015:185
Decided: 19 Mar 2015
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary)
Applicant: OTP Bank Nyrt
Defendants: Magyar Állam; Magyar Államkincstár
Rapporteur: F. Biltgen
Advocate General: N. Jääskinen
Bench: 3 judges
A. Borg Barthet, E. Levits, F. Biltgen
Language: Hungarian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0672

Topics

History · 1 version

19 Mar 2015Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)
Cited by 15: Eesti Pagar AS v Ettevõtluse Arendamise Sihtasutus and Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium (C-349/17); Davide Gullotta and Farmacia di Gullotta Davide & C. Sas v Ministero della Salute and Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Catania (C-497/12); Jean-Philippe Lahorgue v Ordre des avocats du barreau de Lyon and Others (C-99/16); European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (C-516/22); Fondul Proprietatea SA v Guvernul României and Others (C-179/20); Sun West and Others v European Commission (T-623/20); Solar Electric Holding and Others v European Commission (T-678/20); Christa Plessers v PREFACO NV and Belgische Staat (C-509/17); Athletic Club v European Commission (T-679/16); Südwestrundfunk v Tilo Rittinger and Others (C-492/17); Brussels South Charleroi Airport (BSCA) v European Commission (T-818/14); Fondul Proprietatea SA v Complexul Energetic Oltenia SA (C-150/16); Paul Vervloet and Others v Ministerraad (C-76/15); Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) and European Commission vAlouminion tis Ellados VEAE (C-590/14 P)2 provisions; Electrabel SA and Dunamenti Erőmű Zrt v European Commission (C-357/14 P)3 provisions
Cites 24: Fallimento Traghetti del Mediterraneo SpA v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri (C-140/09); Aziz Melki and Sélim Abdeli (C-188/10, C-189/10); PreussenElektra AG v Schhleswag AG, in the presence of Windpark Reußenköge III GmbH and Land Schleswig-Holstein (C-379/98); Eugen Schmidberger, Internationale Transporte und Planzüge v Republik Österreich (C-112/00); Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Tiziana Bruno and Massimo Pettini and Daniela Lotti and Clara Matteucci (C-395/08, C-396/08); Residex Capital IV CV v Gemeente Rotterdam (C-275/10); P Oy (C-6/12); Centre d’exportation du livre français (CELF) and Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication v Société internationale de diffusion et d’édition (SIDE) (C-199/06); Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (C-75/97); Syndicat français de l'Express international (SFEI) and others v La Poste and others (C-39/94); Unicredito Italiano SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate, Ufficio Genova 1 (C-148/04); Mediaset SpA v European Commission (C-403/10); Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (C-277/00); Namur-Les Assurances du Crédit SA v Office National du Ducroire and the Belgian State (C-44/93); Commission of the European Communities v MTU Friedrichshafen GmbH (C-520/07); Hristo Byankov v Glaven sekretar na Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti (C-249/11); Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Agenzia delle Entrate v Paint Graphos Soc. coop. arl, Adige Carni Soc. coop. arl, in liquidation v Agenzia delle Entrate and Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Ministero delle Finanze v Michele Franchetto (C-78/08, C-79/08, C-80/08); J. van der Weerd and Others, H. de Rooy sr. and H. de Rooy jr., Maatschap H. en J. van ’t Oever and Others and B. J. van Middendorp v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (C-222/05, C-223/05, C-224/05, C-225/05); Fédération Nationale du Commerce Extérieur des Produits Alimentaires and Syndicat National des Négociants et Transformateurs de Saumon v French Republic (C-354/90); Déménagements-Manutention Transport SA (DMT) (C-256/97); Belgische Staat v Eugène Van Calster and Felix Cleeren and Openbaar Slachthuis NV (C-261/01, C-262/01); Nazairdis SAS, now Distribution Casino France SAS and Others v Caisse nationale de l'organisation autonome d'assurance vieillesse des travailleurs non salariés des professions industrielles et commerciales (Organic) (C-266/04, C-267/04, C-268/04, C-269/04, C-270/04, C-276/04, C-321/04, C-322/04, C-323/04, C-324/04, C-325/04); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-372/97); Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze v Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA, Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di San Miniato and Cassa di Risparmio di San Miniato SpA (C-222/04)