Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Proceedings brought by VĮ „Indėlių ir investicijų draudimas“ and Virgilijus Vidutis Nemaniūnas (C-671/13)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The third question
58

Proceedings brought by VĮ „Indėlių ir investicijų draudimas“ and Virgilijus Vidutis Nemaniūnas (C-671/13)

Judgment of 25 Jun 2015law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-671-13/para_58@2026-11-10

58In the present case, as the Advocate General has observed in point 86 of his Opinion, Directive 97/9 is, in so far it concerns the delimitation of the cases protected, sufficiently clear, precise and unconditional to be relied on directly by individuals.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-671/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2015:418
Decided: 25 Jun 2015
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania)
Rapporteur: J.L. da Cruz Vilaça
Advocate General: P. Cruz Villalón
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, K. Lenaerts, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça
Language: Lithuanian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0671

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

25 Jun 2015Reading

Connections

Interprets 3: Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC; Directive 97/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 March 1997 on investor-compensation schemes; Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes
Cited by 5: Criminal proceedings against Daniel Adam Popławski (C-573/17); Nikolay Kantarev v Balgarska Narodna Banka (C-571/16); Gmina Wrocław v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej (C-604/19); David Smith v Patrick Meade and Others (C-122/17); Agnieška Anisimovienė and Others v bankas „Snoras“ AB, in liquidation and Others (C-688/15, C-109/16)2 provisions
Cites 6: Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC; Marleasing SA v La Comercial Internacional de Alimentacion SA (C-106/89); Maribel Dominguez v Centre informatique du Centre Ouest Atlantique and Préfet de la région Centre (C-282/10); Directive 97/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 March 1997 on investor-compensation schemes; Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes; Council Directive 86/635/EEC of 8 December 1986 on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions