Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Parliament v European Commission (C-65/13)
Judgment
The action
Findings of the Court
Preliminary observations
45

European Parliament v European Commission (C-65/13)

Judgment of 15 Oct 2014law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-65-13/para_45@2026-11-10

45Furthermore, it follows from Article 290(1) TFEU in conjunction with Article 291(2) TFEU that in exercising an implementing power, the Commission may neither amend nor supplement the legislative act, even as to its non-essential elements.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-65/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2014:2289
Decided: 15 Oct 2014
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: European Parliament
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: K. Lenaerts
Advocate General: P. Cruz Villalón
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, K. Lenaerts, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0065

Topics

Acts of the institutions

History · 1 version

15 Oct 2014Reading

Connections

Cited by 13: Beeren-, Wild-, Feinfrucht GmbH v Hauptzollamt Erfurt (C-825/19); Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-557/23)2 provisions; Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-558/23)2 provisions; Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board (T-599/22); Volkskreditbank AG v Single Resolution Board (T-406/22); Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board (T-395/22); Tazzetti SpA and Tazzetti, SA v European Commission (T-825/19); MS v Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH (C-522/21); Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises SAS v European Commission (C-682/20 P); Fenix International Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (C-695/20)2 provisions; Giovanni Pesce and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri - Dipartimento della Protezione Civile and Others (C-78/16, C-79/16); Kingdom of the Netherlands v European Commission (T-261/13, T-86/14)2 provisions; European Commission v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-88/14)2 provisions
Cites 9: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union Text with EEA relevance; European Commission v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-427/12); European Parliament and Kingdom of Denmark v Commission of the European Communities (C-14/06); Portuguese Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-159/96); European Parliament v Commission of the European Communities (C-403/05); Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities (C-478/93); European Parliament v European Commission (C-65/13); 2012/733/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 26 November 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the clearance of vacancies and applications for employment and the re-establishment of EURES (notified under document C(2012) 8548) Text with EEA relevance