93However, as the General Court correctly held in paragraph 109 of the judgment under appeal, considerations as general as those relied on by ClientEarth are not capable of demonstrating that the principles of transparency and democracy raised in this case issues of particularly pressing concern which could have prevailed over the reasons justifying the refusal to disclose in their entirety the contested studies placed in a file relating to the pre-litigation phase of infringement proceedings (see, to that effect, judgments in LPN and Finland v Commission, C‑514/11 P and C‑605/11 P, EU:C:2013:738, paragraphs 93 and 95, and Strack v Commission, C‑127/13 P, EU:C:2014:2250, paragraph 131).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.