81Such reasoning is incompatible with the requirement that such a presumption must be interpreted and applied strictly, since that presumption is an exception to the rule that the institution concerned is obliged to make a specific and individual examination of every document which is the subject of an application for access (see, to that effect, the judgment in LPN and Finland v Commission, C‑514/11 P and C‑605/11 P, EU:C:2013:738, paragraph 44 and case-law cited) and, more generally, to the principle that the public should have the widest possible access to the documents held by the institutions of the European Union (see, to that effect, judgments in Sweden v MyTravel and Commission, C‑506/08 P, EU:C:2011:496, paragraph 48, and Council v in ‘t Veld, C‑350/12 P, EU:C:2014:2039, paragraph 48).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.