Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Proceedings brought by F.E. Familienprivatstiftung Eisenstadt (C-589/13)
Judgment
The question referred for a preliminar…
Restriction on the free movement of ca…
35

Proceedings brought by F.E. Familienprivatstiftung Eisenstadt (C-589/13)

Judgment of 17 Sept 2015law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-589-13/para_35@2026-11-10

35According to the settled case-law of the Court, Article 56(1) EC lays down a general prohibition on restrictions on the movement of capital between Member States (judgments in Persche, C‑318/07, EU:C:2009:33, paragraph 23, and Mattner, C‑510/08, EU:C:2010:216, paragraph 18).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-589/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2015:612
Decided: 17 Sept 2015
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria)
Rapporteur: A. Rosas
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 5 judges
T. von Danwitz, C. Vajda, A. Rosas, E. Juhász, D. Šváby
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0589

Topics

Free movement of capital

History · 1 version

17 Sept 2015Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 2: Sabine Hünnebeck v Finanzamt Krefeld (C-479/14)2 provisions; Familienstiftung v Finanzamt Köln-West (C-142/24)
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Glaxo Wellcome GmbH & Co. KG v Finanzamt München II (C-182/08); Finanzamt Dortmund-Unna v Josef Grünewald (C-559/13); DMC Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v Finanzamt Hamburg-Mitte (C-164/12); Hughes de Lasteyrie du Saillant v Ministère de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie (C-9/02); Proceedings brought by Aberdeen Property Fininvest Alpha Oy (C-303/07); Argenta Spaarbank NV v Belgische Staat (C-350/11); Gerhard Dijkman and Maria Dijkman-Lavaleije v Belgische Staat (C-233/09); Metallgesellschaft Ltd and Others, Hoechst AG and Hoechst (UK) Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and HM Attorney General (C-397/98, C-410/98); Vera Mattner v Finanzamt Velbert (C-510/08)2 provisions; Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken and Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Q (C-133/13); National Grid Indus BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Rijnmond/kantoor Rotterdam (C-371/10); Oy AA (C-231/05); Santander Asset Management SGIIC SA, on behalf of FIM Santander Top 25 Euro Fi (C‑338/11) v Directeur des résidents à l'étranger et des services généraux and Santander Asset Management SGIIC SA, on behalf of Cartera Mobiliaria SA SICAV (C‑339/11 to C‑347/11) and Others v Ministre du Budget, des Comptes publics, de la Fonction publique et de la Réforme de l’État (C-338/11, C-339/11, C-340/11, C-341/11, C-342/11, C-343/11, C-344/11, C-345/11, C-346/11, C-347/11); Hein Persche v Finanzamt Lüdenscheid (C-318/07); Petri Manninen (C-319/02); Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-34/98); Société Papillon v Ministère du Budget, des Comptes publics et de la Fonction publique (C-418/07); X and Y v Riksskatteverket (C-436/00); European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (C-591/13); Cadbury Schweppes plc and Cadbury Schweppes Overseas Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (C-196/04)