Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
eVigilo Ltd v Priešgaisrinės apsaugos ir gelbėjimo departamentas prie Vidaus reikalų ministerijos (C-538/13)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referre…
Question 2
61

eVigilo Ltd v Priešgaisrinės apsaugos ir gelbėjimo departamentas prie Vidaus reikalų ministerijos (C-538/13)

Judgment of 12 Mar 2015law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-538-13/para_61@2026-11-10

61According to the case-law, as follows from the use of the phrase ‘for example’, that list is non-exhaustive (see judgment in Commission v Netherlands, C‑368/10, EU:C:2012:284, paragraph 84).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-538/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2015:166
Decided: 12 Mar 2015
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania)
Applicant: eVigilo Ltd
Defendants: Priešgaisrinės apsaugos ir gelbėjimo departamentas prie Vidaus reikalų ministerijos; NT Service UAB; HNIT-Baltic UAB
Rapporteur: E. Juhász
Advocate General: N. Jääskinen
Bench: 5 judges
T. von Danwitz, C. Vajda, A. Rosas, E. Juhász, D. Šváby
Language: Lithuanian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0538

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

12 Mar 2015Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts; Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts
Cited by 11: SC Star Storage SA and Others v Institutul Naţional de Cercetare-Dezvoltare în Informatică (ICI) and Others (C-439/14, C-488/14); EPIC Financial Consulting Ges.m.b.H. v Republik Österreich and Bundesbeschaffung GmbH (C-274/21); OHB System AG v European Commission (C-415/23); Global Translation Solutions ltd. v European Parliament (T-7/20); Šiaulių regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras and „Ecoservice projektai“ UAB (C-531/16)2 provisions; Vakakis kai Synergates - Symvouloi gia Agrotiki Anaptixi AE Meleton, formerly Vakakis International - Symvouloi gia Agrotiki Anaptixi AE v European Commission (T-292/15); Archus sp. z o.o. and Gama Jacek Lipik v Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A (C-131/16); Marina del Mediterráneo SL and Others v Agencia Pública de Puertos de Andalucía (C-391/15); MT Højgaard A/S and Züblin A/S v Banedanmark (C-396/14); MedEval - Qualitäts-, Leistungs- und Struktur-Evaluierung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH (C-166/14); Orizzonte Salute - Studio Infermieristico Associato v Azienda Pubblica di Servizi alla persona San Valentino – Città di Levico Terme and Others (C-61/14)
Cites 15: Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts; Universale-Bau AG, Bietergemeinschaft: 1) Hinteregger & Söhne Bauges.m.b.H. Salzburg, 2) ÖSTÜ-STETTIN Hoch- und Tiefbau GmbH v Entsorgungsbetriebe Simmering GmbH (C-470/99); SIAC Construction Ltd v County Council of the County of Mayo (C-19/00); Commission of the European Communities v CAS Succhi di Frutta SpA (C-496/99 P); Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts; Ministero dell’Interno v Fastweb SpA (C-19/13); Michaniki AE v Ethniko Symvoulio Radiotileorasis and Ypourgos Epikrateias (C-213/07); Cartiera dell’Adda SpA v CEM Ambiente SpA (C-42/13); Uniplex (UK) Ltd v NHS Business Services Authority (C-406/08); Idrodinamica Spurgo Velox srl and Others v Acquedotto Pugliese SpA (C-161/13); SAG ELV Slovensko a.s. and Others v Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie (C-599/10); Club Hotel Loutraki AE and Others v Ethnico Symvoulio Radiotileorasis and Ypourgos Epikrateias and Aktor Anonymi Techniki Etaireia (Aktor ATE) v Ethnico Symvoulio Radiotileorasis (C-145/08, C-149/08); Lämmerzahl GmbH v Freie Hansestadt Bremen (C-241/06); European Commission v Ireland (C-456/08); European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-368/10)2 provisions