Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Eventech Ltd v The Parking Adjudicator (C-518/13)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referre…
The first and second questions
54

Eventech Ltd v The Parking Adjudicator (C-518/13)

Judgment of 14 Jan 2015law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-518-13/para_54@2026-11-10

54In that regard, it must be recalled that Article 107(1) TFEU prohibits State aid ‘favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods’, that is to say, selective aid (the judgment in Mediaset v Commission, C‑403/10 P, EU:C:2011:533, paragraph 36).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-518/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2015:9
Decided: 14 Jan 2015
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (United Kingdom)
Applicants: The Queen; Eventech Ltd
Defendant: The Parking Adjudicator
Rapporteur: A. Arabadjiev
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, K. Lenaerts, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0518

Topics

History · 1 version

14 Jan 2015Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)
Cited by 22: Prestige and Limousine, S.L. v Área Metropolitana de Barcelona and Others (C-50/21)2 provisions; Staten genom Sjöfartsverket v Stockholms Hamn AB (C-401/24); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-489/21); Fachverband Spielhallen eV and LM v European Commission (T-510/20 R); Cividale SpA and Others v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Others (C-746/23); Kingdom of Denmark v European Commission (T-364/20); Autorità di sistema portuale del Mar Ligure occidentale and Others v European Commission (T-166/21); European Commission and Interessengemeinschaft der Grenzhändler (IGG) v Dansk Erhverv (C-508/21 P); Ryanair DAC and Airport Marketing Services Ltd v European Commission (T-79/21); Interessengemeinschaft der Hoteliers und Gastronomen Region 10 eV (Ighoga Region 10) and Others v European Commission (T-582/20); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and ITV plc v European Commission (T-363/19); Gmina Kosakowo v European Commission (T-209/15); Ryanair DAC and Others v European Commission (T-448/18); TUIfly GmbH v European Commission (T-447/18); Dansk Erhverv v European Commission (T-47/19)2 provisions; Arriva Italia Srl and Others v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (C-385/18); Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Azienda Napoletana Mobilità SpA (C-659/17); Achema AB and Others v Valstybinė kainų ir energetikos kontrolės komisija (VKEKK) (C-706/17); Union des Ports de France - UPF v European Commission (T-747/17); Chambre de commerce et d'industrie métropolitaine Bretagne-Ouest (port de Brest) v European Commission (T-754/17); Athletic Club v European Commission (T-679/16); Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd and Airport Marketing Services Ltd v European Commission (T-165/15)2 provisions
Cites 8: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Eric Libert and Others v Gouvernement flamand (C‑197/11) and All Projects & Developments NV and Others v Vlaamse Regering (C‑203/11) (C-197/11, C-203/11); Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG and Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH v European Commission (C-288/11 P); European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-279/08 P); Frucona Košice a.s. v European Commission (C-73/11 P); Mediaset SpA v European Commission (C-403/10); Bouygues SA and Others v European Commission and Others (C-399/10 P, C-401/10 P); Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, and Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht (C-280/00)