Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro AE v European Commission (C-506/13 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The seventh ground of appeal
Findings of the Court
87

Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro AE v European Commission (C-506/13 P)

Judgment of 9 Sept 2015law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-506-13/para_87@2026-11-10

87Accordingly, Lito’s complaint relating to the assessment of the legal nature of the methods for the calculation of costs must be rejected given that it is not capable of leading to the judgment under appeal being set aside.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-506/13 P · ECLI:EU:C:2015:562
Decided: 9 Sept 2015
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro AE
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: F. Biltgen
Advocate General: P. Cruz Villalón
Bench: 5 judges
A. Tizzano, S. Rodin, A. Borg Barthet, M. Berger, F. Biltgen
Language: Greek
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0506

Topics

Research and technological development and space

History · 1 version

9 Sept 2015Reading

Connections

Cited by 22: LE v European Commission (C-781/22); European Commission v HB (C-160/22 P); Engineering - Ingegneria Informatica SpA v European Commission and European Research Executive Agency (T-222/22); Engineering - Ingegneria Informatica SpA v European Commission (T-273/22); Universität Koblenz-Landau v European Education and Culture Executive Agency (C-288/21); Green Power Technologies, SL v Key Digital Technologies Joint Undertaking (T-533/20); LE v European Commission (T-475/20); Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz – Port Polski Ośrodek Rozwoju Technologii v European Commission (T-4/20); HB v European Commission (T-796/19); HB v European Commission (T-795/19); Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro AE v European Commission (T-191/16); ADR Center Srl v European Commission (T-364/15); Health Information Management (HIM) v European Commission (T-235/19); Fabio De Masi and Yanis Varoufakis v European Central Bank (C-342/19 P)2 provisions; Inclusion Alliance for Europe GEIE v European Commission (C-378/16 P); ADR Center SpA v European Commission (C-584/17 P)3 provisions; European Union Satellite Centre v KF (C-14/19 P); SC v Eulex Kosovo (C-730/18 P); Help - Hilfe zur Selbsthilfe eV v European Commission (T-335/17); BTC Srl v European Commission (T-786/17); Instytut Podstawowych Problemów Techniki Polskiej Akademii Nauk (IPPT PAN) v European Commission and Research Executive Agency (REA) (T-805/16); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (T-229/17)
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Interporc Im- und Export GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-41/00 P); Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-583/11 P); Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle für Getreide und Futtermittel (11/70); Di Lenardo Adriano Srl and Dilexport Srl v Ministero del Commercio con l'Estero (C-37/02, C-38/02); R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. and Others v Commission of the European Communities (C-131/03 P); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Union (C-84/94); Commission of the European Communities v Jan Zoubek (C-426/85); The Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health (C-210/03); Heinrich Maag v European Commission (C-43/84); Aloys Schröder, Jan Thamann and Karl-Julius Thamann v Commission of the European Communities (C-221/97 P); Greinwald GmbH v Nicolas Wessang (C-608/12); Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro AE v European Commission (T-552/11); Jose Maria Sison v Council of the European Union (C-266/05 P); Comité des industries du coton et des fibres connexes de l'Union européenne (Eurocoton) and Others v Council of the European Union (C-76/01 P); Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-404/04); International Business Machines Corporation v Commission of the European Communities (C-60/81); Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV v European Commission (C-362/08)