Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (C-502/13)
Judgment
The pre-litigation procedure and the p…
24

European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (C-502/13)

Judgment of 5 Mar 2015law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-502-13/para_24@2026-11-10

24Since it was not satisfied with the explanations provided by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Commission decided to bring the present action.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-502/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2015:143
Decided: 5 Mar 2015
Procedure: Infringement action
Applicant: European Commission
Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Rapporteur: A. Prechal
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 5 judges
L. Bay Larsen, K. Jürimäe, J. Malenovský, M. Safjan, A. Prechal
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0502

Topics

History · 1 version

5 Mar 2015Reading

Connections

Cited by 6: LC and CP v Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione Internazionale di Roma – sezione procedure alla frontiera II (C-758/24); CV v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky (C-406/22); État belge v Oxycure Belgium SA (C-573/15)2 provisions; Proceedings brought by Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (RPO) (C-390/15)2 provisions; European Commission v Italian Republic (C-601/14); ЕТ „Маya Маrinova“ v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (C-576/15)
Cites 10: Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; European Commission v French Republic (C-596/10); Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 of 15 March 2011 laying down implementing measures for Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (recast); Council Directive 2009/47/EC of 5 May 2009 amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards reduced rates of value added tax; Finanzamt Steglitz v Ines Zimmermann (C-174/11); K Oy (C-219/13); European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-360/11); Council Directive 2010/88/EU of 7 December 2010 amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, with regard to the duration of the obligation to respect a minimum standard rate; NCC Construction Danmark A/S v Skatteministeriet (C-174/08); European Commission v Republic of Austria (C-189/09)