32In that connection, it has been held, with regard to a product having two possible uses, that, as one of those uses was no more than a purely theoretical possibility, that product was, on the basis of its objective characteristics and properties, naturally intended for the other use and therefore came under the tariff heading relating to that use (see, by analogy, Thyssen Haniel Logistic, C‑459/93, EU:C:1995:160, paragraphs 17 and 18). Likewise, according to the case-law, in order to be classified under the tariff heading relating to a use, the product to be classified need not be solely or exclusively intended for that use. It suffices that that use is the main use for which the product is intended (see, to that effect, Neckermann Versand, C‑395/93, EU:C:1994:318, paragraphs 8 and 9, and Anagram International, C‑14/05, EU:C:2006:465, paragraph 26).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.