Judgment_paragraph 52 · Vasiliki Balazs v Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Cluj and Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Cluj v Attila Balazs (C-401/13, C-432/13)

52As the Advocate General has observed in points 98 and 99 of his Opinion, the Romanian Government has not established that there is a risk of serious difficulties. Whilst the Romanian Government refers to 800 applications similar to those of Mr and Mrs Balazs, it does not mention at all the total number of persons in a position comparable to theirs. Nor has the Romanian Government specified whether the sum of RON 38560683 also covers the 800 similar applications that are currently pending. These applications would in any event not be affected by a limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment (see, to this effect, judgment in Bosman, C‑415/93, EU:C:1995:463, paragraph 144).

Vasiliki Balazs v Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Cluj and Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Cluj v Attila Balazs (C-401/13, C-432/13)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections