Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Cartel Damage Claims (CDC) Hydrogen Peroxide SA v Evonik Degussa GmbH and Others (C-352/13)
Consideration of the questions referred
The second question
37

Cartel Damage Claims (CDC) Hydrogen Peroxide SA v Evonik Degussa GmbH and Others (C-352/13)

Judgment of 21 May 2015law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-352-13/para_37@2026-11-10

37In that regard, the Court notes that Article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001 must be interpreted independently and strictly (judgment in Kolassa, C‑375/13, EU:C:2015:37, paragraph 43).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-352/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2015:335
Decided: 21 May 2015
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Landgericht Dortmund (Germany)
Applicant: Cartel Damage Claims (CDC) Hydrogen Peroxide SA
Defendants: Akzo Nobel NV; Solvay SA/NV; Kemira Oyj; FMC Foret SA
Rapporteur: M. Safjan
Advocate General: N. Jääskinen
Bench: 5 judges
L. Bay Larsen, K. Jürimäe, J. Malenovský, M. Safjan, A. Prechal
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0352

Topics

Judicial cooperation in civil matters

History · 1 version

21 May 2015Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
Cited by 17: Tibor-Trans Fuvarozó és Kereskedelmi Kft. v DAF TRUCKS N.V (C-451/18)4 provisions; Paweł Hofsoe v LVM Landwirtschaftlicher Versicherungsverein Münster AG (C-106/17); Ryanair DAC v DelayFix (C-519/19); AB ‘flyLAL-Lithunian Airlines’ v Starptautiskā lidosta ‘Rīga’ VAS and ‘Air Baltic Corporation’ AS (C-27/17); Helga Löber v Barclays Bank PLC (C-304/17)2 provisions; RH v AB Volvo and Others (C-30/20); Maximilian Schrems v Facebook Ireland Limited (C-498/16); Maersk A/S v Allianz Seguros y Reaseguros SA and Mapfre España Compañía de Seguros y Reaseguros SA v MACS Maritime Carrier Shipping GmbH & Co (C-345/22); Mircom International Content Management & Consulting (M.I.C.M.) Limited v Telenet BVBA (C-597/19); Beverage City & Lifestyle GmbH and Others v Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc (C-832/21); Athenian Brewery SA and Heineken NV v Macedonian Thrace Brewery SA (C-393/23)2 provisions; Stichting Right to Consumer Justice and Stichting App Stores Claims v Apple Distribution International Ltd and Apple Inc (C-34/24)2 provisions; MOL Magyar Olaj- és Gázipari Nyrt. v Mercedes-Benz Group AG (C-425/22)2 provisions; Electricity & Water Authority of the Government of Bahrain and Others v Prysmian Netherlands BV and Others (C-672/23); E.B.SP. Z.O.O. v K.P.SP. Z.O.O (C-682/23); Deutsche Lufthansa AG v AirHelp Germany GmbH (C-551/24); Apple Sales International and Others v MJA (C-595/17)2 provisions
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; Harald Kolassa v Barclays Bank plc (C-375/13)2 provisions; Refcomp SpA v Axa Corporate Solutions Assurance SA and Others (C-543/10); ÖFAB, Östergötlands Fastigheter AB v Frank Koot and Evergreen Investments BV (C-147/12); Coreck Maritime GmbH v Handelsveem BV and Others (C-387/98); Land Berlin v Ellen Mirjam Sapir and Others (C-645/11); Trasporti Castelletti Spedizioni Internazionali SpA v Hugo Trumpy SpA (C-159/97); Francesco Benincasa v Dentalkit Srl (C-269/95); Zuid-Chemie BV v Philippo's Mineralenfabriek NV/SA (C-189/08); Powell Duffryn plc v Wolfgang Petereit (C-214/89); Melzer v MF Global UK Ltd (C-228/11); Freeport plc v Olle Arnoldsson (C-98/06); Reisch Montage AG v Kiesel Baumaschinen Handels GmbH (C-103/05); Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH and Others (C-145/10); Hi Hotel HCF SARL v Uwe Spoering (C-387/12); 2006/903/EC: Commission Decision of 3 May 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement against Akzo Nobel NV, Akzo Nobel Chemicals Holding AB, EKA Chemicals AB, Degussa AG, Edison SpA, FMC Corporation, FMC Foret S.A., Kemira OYJ, L'Air Liquide SA, Chemoxal SA, Snia SpA, Caffaro Srl, Solvay SA/NV, Solvay Solexis SpA, Total SA, Elf Aquitaine SA and Arkema SA. (Case COMP/F/C.38.620 — Hydrogen Peroxide and perborate) (notified under document number C(2006) 1766) (Text with EEA relevance); Coty Germany GmbH v First Note Perfumes NV (C-360/12); Estasis Salotti di Colzani Aimo e Gianmario Colzani s.n.c. v Rüwa Polstereimaschinen GmbH (C-24/76); Régie nationale des usines Renault SA v Maxicar SpA and Orazio Formento (C-38/98)