Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v IPK International - World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH (C-336/13 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The error of law as regards the capita…
Findings of the Court
54

European Commission v IPK International - World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH (C-336/13 P)

Judgment of 12 Feb 2015law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-336-13/para_54@2026-11-10

54However, as the Advocate General observed in point 120 of his Opinion, there is no specific justification, in the present case, for the capitalisation of the default interest payable to IPK.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Seventh Chamber
Case: C-336/13 P · ECLI:EU:C:2015:83
Decided: 12 Feb 2015
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: European Commission
Defendant: IPK International — World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH
Rapporteur: J.L. da Cruz Vilaça
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 3 judges
J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0336

Topics

Economic, social and territorial cohesion

History · 1 version

12 Feb 2015Reading

Connections

Cited by 16: SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission (T-313/21); Air Canada v European Commission (T-310/21); LATAM Airlines Group SA and Lan Cargo SA v European Commission (C-375/22 P); European Commission v Deutsche Telekom AG (C-221/22 P); Campine and Campine Recycling v European Commission (T-94/20); Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission (T-610/19)2 provisions; European Commission v Printeos, SA (C-301/19 P)7 provisions; Council of the European Union v Dr. K. Chrysostomides & Co. and Others (C-597/18 P, C-598/18 P, C-603/18 P, C-604/18 P); Appeals – Actions for damages – Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU – Excessive length of the proceedings in a case before the General Court of the European Union – Compensation for the damage allegedly sustained by the applicant – Concept of a ‘single undertaking’ not applied – Material damage – Bank guarantee costs – Causal link – Loss of profit – Non-pecuniary damage – Liability of the European Union for damage caused by infringements of EU law arising from a decision of the General Court – No incurring of liability (C-447/17 P, C-479/17 P); River Kwai International Food Industry Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (C-144/18); Printeos, SA v European Commission (T-201/17)3 provisions; Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-588/17); Vakakis kai Synergates - Symvouloi gia Agrotiki Anaptixi AE Meleton, formerly Vakakis International - Symvouloi gia Agrotiki Anaptixi AE v European Commission (T-292/15); Intel Corp. v European Commission (C-413/14 P); Plásticos Españoles, SA (ASPLA) and Armando Álvarez, SA v European Union, represented by the Court of Justice of the European Union (T-40/15); Gascogne Sack Deutschland GmbH and Gascogne v European Union (T-577/14)
Cites 14: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Établissements Biret et Cie SA v Council of the European Union (C-94/02 P); European Commission v IPK International - World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH (C-336/13); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-544/09); Agraz, SA and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-285/03); IPK International — World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH v European Commission (T-671/11); Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P); French Republic v People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (C-27/09 P); European Commission v Augusto Brazzelli Lualdi (C-136/92); IPK International - World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH v European Commission (T-297/05); Hungary v European Commission (C-31/13 P); Comitato «Venezia vuole vivere», Hotel Cipriani Srl and Società Italiana per il gas SpA (Italgas) v European Commission (C-71/09 P, C-73/09 P, C-76/09 P); J. M. Mulder and others and Otto Heinemann v Council of the European Communities and Commission of the European Communities (C-104/89); Federación Española de Empresas de Tecnología Sanitaria (FENIN) v Commission of the European Communities (C-205/03 P)