Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Elisabeta Dano and Florin Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig (C-333/13)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
Question 1
55

Elisabeta Dano and Florin Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig (C-333/13)

Judgment of 11 Nov 2014law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-333-13/para_55@2026-11-10

55In the light of all the foregoing considerations, the answer to the first question is that Regulation No 883/2004 must be interpreted as meaning that ‘special non‑contributory cash benefits’ as referred to in Articles 3(3) and 70 of the regulation fall within the scope of Article 4 of the regulation.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-333/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2014:2358
Decided: 11 Nov 2014
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Sozialgericht Leipzig (Germany)
Applicants: Elisabeta Dano; Florin Dano
Defendant: Jobcenter Leipzig
Rapporteur: M. Berger
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 13 judges
V. Skouris, K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, L. Bay Larsen, T. von Danwitz, C. Vajda, S. Rodin, E. Juhász, A. Borg Barthet, J. Malenovský, E. Levits, M. Berger, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0333

Topics

Charter of Fundamental Rights Non-discrimination on grounds of nationality

History · 1 version

11 Nov 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (Text with EEA relevance); Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (Text with relevance for the EEA and for Switzerland)
Cited by 11: CG v The Department for Communities in Northern Ireland (C-709/20); Jobcenter Krefeld - Widerspruchsstelle v JD (C-181/19)3 provisions; Denis Raugevicius (C-247/17); Regulation (EU) 2026/2359; Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v V. M (C-151/24)2 provisions; S v Familienkasse Niedersachsen-Bremen der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (C-411/20); Associazione per gli Studi Giuridici sull’Immigrazione (ASGI) and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri – Dipartimento per le politiche della famiglia and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze (C-462/20); A v Latvijas Republikas Veselības ministrija (C-535/19); European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (C-308/14)3 provisions; Vestische Arbeit Jobcenter Kreis Recklinghausen v Jovanna García-Nieto and Others (C-299/14)3 provisions; Jobcenter Berlin Neukölln v Nazifa Alimanovic and Others (C-67/14)2 provisions
Cites 14: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (Text with EEA relevance); Rudy Grzelczyk v Centre public d'aide sociale d'Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve (C-184/99); Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (Text with relevance for the EEA and for Switzerland); Åklagaren v Hans Åkerberg Fransson (C-617/10); Nagy Sándor and Others v Hajdú-Bihar megyei Kormányhivatal and Others (C-488/12); Marie-Nathalie D'Hoop v Office national de l'emploi (C-224/98); Tomasz Ziolkowski and Barbara Szeja and Others v Land Berlin (C-424/10, C-425/10); Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v Peter Brey (C-140/12); L. N. v Styrelsen for Videregående Uddannelser og Uddannelsesstøtte (C-46/12); Marc Betriu Montull v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) (C-5/12); Council Regulation (EEC) No 1247/92 of 30 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self- employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community