Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Árpád Kásler and Hajnalka Káslerné Rábai v OTP Jelzálogbank Zrt (C-26/13)
Judgment
The questions referred for a prelimina…
The first question
50

Árpád Kásler and Hajnalka Káslerné Rábai v OTP Jelzálogbank Zrt (C-26/13)

Judgment of 30 Apr 2014law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-26-13/para_50@2026-11-10

50By contrast, terms ancillary to those that define the very essence of the contractual relationship cannot fall within the notion of the ‘main subject-matter of the contract’ within the meaning of Article 4(2) of Directive 93/13.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-26/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2014:282
Decided: 30 Apr 2014
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Kúria (Hungary)
Applicants: Árpád Kásler; Hajnalka Káslerné Rábai
Defendant: OTP Jelzálogbank Zrt
Rapporteur: A. Prechal
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 4 judges
L. Bay Larsen, A. Prechal, F. Biltgen, K. Jürimäe
Language: Hungarian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0026

Topics

Approximation of laws Consumer protection

History · 1 version

30 Apr 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Directive 93/13/EEC3 provisions
Interpreted by the courts in 1: Kamil Dziubak and Justyna Dziubak v Raiffeisen Bank International AG, prowadzący działalność w Polsce w formie oddziału pod nazwą Raiffeisen Bank International AG Oddział w Polsce, anciennement Raiffeisen Bank Polska SA (C-260/18)
Cited by 21: CY and Others v Caixabank SA and Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA (C-224/19, C-259/19); VB and Others v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA and AV and Others v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA and Procureur de la République (C-776/19, C-777/19, C-778/19, C-779/19, C-780/19, C-781/19, C-782/19); Banca B. SA v A.A.A (C-269/19); DP and SG v Trapeza Peiraios AE (C-243/20); Caixabank SA v X (C-565/21); D.V. v M.A (C-395/21); E.K. and Others v D.B.P. and Others (C-80/21)2 provisions; Profi Credit Polska S.A. and Others v QJ and Others (C-84/19, C-222/19, C-252/19); Dexia Nederland BV v XXX and Z (C-229/19, C-289/19); BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA v VE (C-609/19); Vicente v Delia (C-335/21); JZ v OTP Jelzálogbank Zrt. and Others (C-932/19)4 provisions; ZH and KN v AxFina Hungary Zrt (C-630/23); UK and Others v Volkswagen Bank GmbH and Others (C-33/20); CAJASUR Banco S.A. v JO and IM (C-35/22); M.P. and B.P. v „A.” prowadzący działalność za pośrednictwem „A.” S.A (C-212/20); Caixabank SA and Others v WE and Others (C-810/21); Ocidental – Companhia Portuguesa de Seguros de Vida SA v LP (C-263/22); Beeren-, Wild-, Feinfrucht GmbH v Hauptzollamt Erfurt (C-825/19); J.J. v PKO BP S.A (C-471/24); Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (C-337/23)
Cites 9: Council Directive 93/13/EEC2 provisions; Banco Español de Crédito, SA v Joaquín Calderón Camino (C-618/10); Jana Pereničová and Vladislav Perenič v SOS financ spol. s r. o (C-453/10); RWE Vertrieb AG v Verbraucherzentrale Nordrhein-Westfalen eV (C-92/11); Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Madrid v Asociación de Usuarios de Servicios Bancarios (Ausbanc) (C-484/08); Nemzeti Fogyasztóvédelmi Hatóság v Invitel Távközlési Zrt (C-472/10); OSA — Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně a.s (C-351/12); Fish Legal and Emily Shirley v Information Commissioner and Others (C-279/12); Árpád Kásler and Hajnalka Káslerné Rábai v OTP Jelzálogbank Zrt (C-26/13)