Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Provincie Antwerpen v Belgacom NV van publiek recht and Mobistar NV (C-256/13, C-264/13)
Judgment
The question referred for a preliminar…
34

Provincie Antwerpen v Belgacom NV van publiek recht and Mobistar NV (C-256/13, C-264/13)

Judgment of 4 Sept 2014law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-256-13/para_34@2026-11-10

34However, Article 13 of the Authorisation Directive does not concern all fees to which infrastructure permitting the provision of networks and electronic communication services are subject.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Cases: C-256/13, C-264/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2014:2149
Decided: 4 Sept 2014
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen (Belgium)
Applicant: Provincie Antwerpen
Defendants: Belgacom NV van publiek recht; Mobistar NV
Rapporteur: E. Jarašiūnas
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, C.G. Fernlund, A. Ó Caoimh, C. Toader, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0256

Topics

Information and Communications Technology

History · 1 version

4 Sept 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive)
Cited by 8: College van Burgemeester en Wethouders van de gemeente Amersfoort v X BV and Visser Vastgoed Beleggingen BV v Raad van de gemeente Appingedam (C-360/15, C-31/16); Proximus SA v Commune d'Etterbeek (C-454/13)2 provisions; Ville de Mons v Base Company, anciennement KPN (C-346/13)2 provisions; this act; Elettronica Industriale SpA v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy (C-10/25); Ayuntamiento de Pamplona v Orange España SAU (C-764/18)3 provisions; Vodafone España SAU v Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa (C-443/19); Proximus SA v Province de Namur (C-517/13)2 provisions
Cites 4: Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive); Vodafone Malta ltd. and Mobisle Communications ltd. v Avukat Ġenerali and Others (C-71/12); Vodafone España SA v Ayuntamiento de Santa Amalia (C‑55/11) Ayuntamiento de Tudela (C‑57/11) and France Telecom España SA v Ayuntamiento de Torremayor (C‑58/11) (C-55/11, C-57/11, C-58/11); Belgacom SA and Others v État belge (C-375/11)