Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Impresa Pizzarotti & C. SpA v Comune di Bari and Others (C-213/13)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
Question 2
60

Impresa Pizzarotti & C. SpA v Comune di Bari and Others (C-213/13)

Judgment of 10 Jul 2014law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-213-13/para_60@2026-11-10

60Accordingly, EU law does not require a judicial body automatically to go back on a judgment having the authority of res judicata in order to take into account the interpretation of a relevant provision of EU law adopted by the Court after delivery of that judgment.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-213/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2014:2067
Decided: 10 Jul 2014
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Consiglio di Stato (Italy)
Applicant: Impresa Pizzarotti & C. SpA
Defendants: Comune di Bari; Giunta comunale di Bari; Consiglio comunale di Bari
Rapporteur: K. Lenaerts
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, K. Lenaerts, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, G. Arestis, J.‑C. Bonichot
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0213

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

10 Jul 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 3: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts; Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts
Cited by 19: FY v Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej (C-582/21)2 provisions; XC and Others v Generalprokuratur (C-234/17)2 provisions; Enzo Di Puma v Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob) and Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob) v Antonio Zecca (C-596/16, C-597/16); Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (C-226/15 P); MA.T.I. SUD SpA v Centostazioni SpA and Duemme SGR SpA v Associazione Cassa Nazionale di Previdenza e Assistenza in favore dei Ragionieri e Periti Commerciali (CNPR) (C-523/16, C-536/16); Stefan Rudigier (C-518/17); T.B. and Others v T. S.A. and Others (C-422/23); Farmacija, d.o.o. v Občina Benedikt (C-715/23); Right to Know CLG v An Taoiseach (C-84/22); European Commission v Republic of Austria (C-537/19); Cabinet de avocat UR v Administraţia Sector 3 a Finanţelor Publice prin Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti and Others (C-424/19); Tedeschi Srl and Consorzio Stabile Istant Service v C.M. Service Srl and Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza (C-402/18); Proceedings brought by Kauno miesto savivaldybė and Kauno miesto savivaldybės administracija (C-285/18); Oana Mădălina Călin v Direcţia Regională a Finanţelor Publice Ploieşti – Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Dâmboviţa and Others (C-676/17)2 provisions; Hochtief Solutions AG Magyarországi Fióktelepe v Fővárosi Törvényszék (C-620/17)3 provisions; Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato - Antitrust and Coopservice Soc. coop. arl v Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale della Vallecamonica - Sebino (ASST) and Others (C-216/17); Criminal proceedings against M.A.S. and M.B (C-42/17); Casertana Costruzioni Srl v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti - Provveditorato Interregionale per le opere pubbliche della Campania e del Molise and Azienda Regionale Campana per la Difesa del Suolo - A.R.CA.DI.S (C-223/16)2 provisions; Partner Apelski Dariusz v Zarząd Oczyszczania Miasta (C-324/14)
Cites 23: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts; Asturcom Telecomunicaciones SL v Cristina Rodríguez Nogueira (C-40/08); Ministero dell'Industria, del Commercio e dell'Artigianato v Lucchini SpA (C-119/05); Helmut Müller GmbH v Bundesanstalt für Immobilienaufgaben (C-451/08); Eco Swiss China Time Ltd v Benetton International NV (C-126/97); Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannelser v Manova A/S (C-336/12); Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (C-70/06); Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-337/98); Michaniki AE v Ethniko Symvoulio Radiotileorasis and Ypourgos Epikrateias (C-213/07); Jean Auroux and Others v Commune de Roanne (C-220/05); Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-536/07); Amministrazione dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Agenzia delle entrate v Fallimento Olimpiclub Srl (C-2/08); European Commission v Slovak Republic (C-507/08); Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts; Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts; María Julia Zurita García and Aurelio Choque Cabrera v Delegado del Gobierno en la Región de Murcia (C-261/08); European Commission v Republic of Cyprus (C-251/09); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-412/04); European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxemburg (C-526/08); European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-576/10); ThyssenKrupp Nirosta GmbH v European Commission (C-352/09 P); Rosmarie Kapferer v Schlank & Schick GmbH (C-234/04)