Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Simon, Evers & Co. GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen (C-21/13)
Judgment
The question referred
Validity of the regulation at issue
34

Simon, Evers & Co. GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen (C-21/13)

Judgment of 4 Sept 2014law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-21-13/para_34@2026-11-10

34Furthermore, Article 18(6) of the same regulation states that if an interested party does not cooperate, or cooperates only partially, so that relevant information is thereby withheld, the result may be less favourable to the party than if it had cooperated.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-21/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2014:2154
Decided: 4 Sept 2014
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany)
Upheld as valid: Regulation 2009/499
Applicant: Simon, Evers & Co. GmbH
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen
Rapporteur: J.L. da Cruz Vilaça
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, G. Arestis, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0021

Topics

History · 1 version

4 Sept 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Regulation (EC) No 499/2009 of 11 June 2009 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of the same product consigned from Thailand, whether declared as originating in Thailand or not
Cited by 17: Çolakoğlu Metalurji AŞ v European Commission (T-379/23)4 provisions; PGTEX Morocco v European Commission (T-246/22); PGTEX Morocco v European Commission (T-245/22); Sinopec Chongqing SVW Chemical Co. Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-762/20); Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group Co., Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-748/21); Guangxi Xin Fu Yuan Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-144/20); Roland SE v European Commission (T-132/18); European Commission v Kolachi Raj Industrial (Private) Ltd (C-709/17 P)2 provisions; European Bicycle Manufacturers Association (EBMA) v Giant (China) Co. Ltd (C-61/16 P); Maxcom Ltd v City Cycle Industries (C-248/15 P, C-254/15 P, C-260/15 P); Maxcom Ltd v Chin Haur Indonesia, PT (C-247/15 P, C-253/15 P, C-259/15 P)2 provisions; ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Ostrava a.s. and Others v Hubei Xinyegang Steel Co. Ltd and Conucil of the European Union v Hubei Xinyegang Steel Co. Ltd (C-186/14 P, C-193/14 P); Portmeirion Group UK Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs (C-232/14); CM Eurologistik GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg and Grünwald Logistik Service GmbH (GLS) v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt (C-283/14, C-284/14); APEX GmbH Internationale Spedition v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt (C-371/14)2 provisions; Bricmate AB v Tullverket (C-569/13); Fliesen-Zentrum Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Regensburg (C-687/13)
Cites 11: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Nuova Agricast Srl v Ministero delle Attività Produttive (C-390/06); Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community; Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities v Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT (Interpipe Niko Tube ZAT) and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT (Interpipe NTRP VAT) (C-191/09 P, C-200/09 P); MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH v Merckle GmbH (C-316/09); Brother International GmbH v Hauptzollamt Gießen (C-26/88); Hoesch Metals and Alloys GmbH v Hauptzollamt Aachen (C-373/08); Council Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 of 18 July 2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People’s Republic of China; Commission Regulation (EC) No 923/2008 of 12 September 2008 initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 684/2008, on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People’s Republic of China by imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts consigned from Thailand, whether declared as originating in Thailand or not and making such imports subject to registration; Council Regulation (EC) No 499/2009 of 11 June 2009 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of the same product consigned from Thailand, whether declared as originating in Thailand or not; Simon, Evers & Co. GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen (C-21/13)