Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-197/13 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The first ground of appeal
Findings of the Court
–Merits
56

Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-197/13 P)

Judgment of 4 Sept 2014law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-197-13/para_56@2026-11-10

56As for the context of Article H(2) of Annex II to Regulation No 1164/94, as amended, it must be stated that the Cohesion Fund was created in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 130d EC by Regulation No 1164/94 in its original version.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-197/13 P · ECLI:EU:C:2014:2157
Decided: 4 Sept 2014
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62010TJ0540
Applicant: Kingdom of Spain
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: F. Biltgen
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 5 judges
A. Tizzano, A. Borg Barthet, E. Levits, S. Rodin, F. Biltgen
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0197

Topics

Economic, social and territorial cohesion

History · 1 version

4 Sept 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-540/10)
Cited by 13: Hellenic Republic v European Commission (C-341/17 P); International Management Group v European Commission (C-183/17 P, C-184/17 P); Italian Republic v European Commission (T-91/16); Tilly-Sabco SAS v European Commission (C-183/16 P); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-327/15); Boomkwekerij van Rijn-de Bruyn BV v Community Plant Variety Office (T-767/14); BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-43/15 P); European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-139/15 P)7 provisions; European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-140/15 P)7 provisions; Johannes Tomana and Others v Council of the European Union and European Commission (C-330/15); Italian Republic v European Commission (C-280/14 P); Portuguese Republic v European Commission (T-314/13); French Republic v European Commission (T-516/10)
Cites 22: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; DR and TV2 Danmark A/S v NCB – Nordisk Copyright Bureau (C-510/10); Interporc Im- und Export GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-41/00 P); Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006; Stadtwerke Schwäbisch Hall GmbH, Stadtwerke Tübingen GmbH and Stadtwerke Uelzen GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-176/06); Laboratoires pharmaceutiques Bergaderm SA and Jean-Jacques Goupil v Commission of the European Communities (C-352/98 P); Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds; Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006 of 8 December 2006 setting out rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and of Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Regional Development Fund; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. and Others v Commission of the European Communities (C-131/03 P); Salzgitter AG, formerly Preussag Stahl AG v Commission of the European Communities and Federal Republic of Germany (C-210/98 P); Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999; Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the European Regional Development Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1783/1999; Commission Regulation (EC) No 448/2001 of 2 March 2001 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 as regards the procedure for making financial corrections to assistance granted under the Structural Funds; Commission of the European Communities v Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) (C-286/95 P); J. J. Zwartveld and others (C-2/88); Council Regulation (EC) No 1084/2006 of 11 July 2006 establishing a Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1164/94; United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Communities (C-68/86); Commission of the European Communities v Solvay SA (C-287/95 P, C-288/95 P); Council Directive 93/38/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors; Council Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 of 16 May 1994 establishing a Cohesion Fund; Commission Regulation (EC) No 1386/2002 of 29 July 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 as regards the management and control systems for assistance granted from the Cohesion Fund and the procedure for making financial corrections; European Commission v Augusto Brazzelli Lualdi (C-136/92)