Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-192/13 P)
Judgment
The action at first instance
95

Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-192/13 P)

Judgment of 4 Sept 2014law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-192-13/para_95@2026-11-10

95Thus, pursuant to the combined provisions of Article H(2) of Annex II to Regulation No 1164/94, as amended, and Article 18(3) of Regulation No 1386/2002, the period at the end of which the Commission must adopt a decision on financial corrections was three months from the date of the hearing.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-192/13 P · ECLI:EU:C:2014:2156
Decided: 4 Sept 2014
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62011TJ0235
Applicant: Kingdom of Spain
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: F. Biltgen
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 5 judges
A. Tizzano, A. Borg Barthet, E. Levits, S. Rodin, F. Biltgen
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0192

Topics

Economic, social and territorial cohesion

History · 1 version

4 Sept 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-235/11)
Cited by 14: Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (T-349/21); Union des industries de la protection des plantes v Premier ministre and Others (C-514/19); European Commission v CX (C-131/19); Amoena Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (C-677/18); Republic of Poland v European Commission (T-366/17); Republic of Poland v European Commission (T-316/15); Republic of Poland v European Commission (T-402/15); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-327/15); Boomkwekerij van Rijn-de Bruyn BV v Community Plant Variety Office (T-767/14); French Republic v European Commission (C-373/15 P)3 provisions; Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-506/15); Club Hotel Loutraki AE and Others v European Commission (C-131/15 P); European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-140/15 P)8 provisions; European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-139/15 P)3 provisions
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; DR and TV2 Danmark A/S v NCB – Nordisk Copyright Bureau (C-510/10); Interporc Im- und Export GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-41/00 P); Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006; Stadtwerke Schwäbisch Hall GmbH, Stadtwerke Tübingen GmbH and Stadtwerke Uelzen GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-176/06); Laboratoires pharmaceutiques Bergaderm SA and Jean-Jacques Goupil v Commission of the European Communities (C-352/98); Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. and Others v Commission of the European Communities (C-131/03 P); Salzgitter AG, formerly Preussag Stahl AG v Commission of the European Communities and Federal Republic of Germany (C-210/98); Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999; Commission Regulation (EC) No 448/2001 of 2 March 2001 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 as regards the procedure for making financial corrections to assistance granted under the Structural Funds; Commission of the European Communities v Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) (C-286/95); J. J. Zwartveld and others (C-2/88); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Communities (C-68/86); Commission of the European Communities v Solvay SA (C-287/95); Council Directive 93/38/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors; Council Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 of 16 May 1994 establishing a Cohesion Fund; Commission Regulation (EC) No 1386/2002 of 29 July 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 as regards the management and control systems for assistance granted from the Cohesion Fund and the procedure for making financial corrections; Council Regulation (EC) No 1264/1999 of 21 June 1999 amending Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 establishing a Cohesion Fund; European Commission v Augusto Brazzelli Lualdi (C-136/92)