Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Theodora Hendrika Bouman v Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen (C-114/13)
Judgment
Consideration of the question referred
Consideration of the question referred
58

Theodora Hendrika Bouman v Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen (C-114/13)

Judgment of 12 Feb 2015law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-114-13/para_58@2026-11-10

58It must therefore be held that the concept may cover the option granted to the person concerned of deciding to continue or to waive his affiliation to a compulsory insurance scheme for certain periods, to the extent that that choice affects the extent of the future social security benefit.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-114/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2015:81
Decided: 12 Feb 2015
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the arbeidshof te Antwerpen (Belgium)
Applicant: Theodora Hendrika Bouman
Defendant: Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen
Rapporteur: M. Berger
Advocate General: M. Szpunar
Bench: 5 judges
A. Tizzano, A. Borg Barthet, E. Levits, M. Berger, F. Biltgen
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0114

Topics

Social security

History · 1 version

12 Feb 2015Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community
Cited by 6: FK v Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien (C-58/21)2 provisions; European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-356/15); European Commission v Republic of Cyprus (C-515/14); Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland e.V. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-461/13); H. T. v Land Baden-Württemberg (C-373/13); Drukarnia Multipress sp. z o.o. v Minister Finansów (C-357/13)
Cites 19: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community; I v Health Service Executive (C-255/13); BLV Wohn- und Gewerbebau GmbH v Finanzamt Lüdenscheid (C-395/11); Council Regulation (EEC) No 1248/92 of 30 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self- employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community and Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71; Criminal proceedings against Daniel Lundberg (C-317/12); Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of the Council of 21 March 1972 fixing the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community; Francis Aubin v Union nationale interprofessionnelle pour l'emploi dans l'industrie et le commerce (UNEDIC) and Association pour l'emploi dans les industries et le commerce des Yvelines (ASSEDIC) (C-227/81); Roberto Adanez-Vega v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (C-372/02); Doris Knoch v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (C-102/91); Thomas Pringle v Government of Ireland and Others (C-370/12); Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Nowym Sączu v Stanisława Tomaszewska (C-440/09); Waldemar Hudzinski v Agentur für Arbeit Wesel — Familienkasse and Jaroslaw Wawrzyniak v Agentur für Arbeit Mönchengladbach — Familienkasse (C-611/10, C-612/10); Brigitte Bosmann v Bundesagentur für Arbeit - Familienkasse Aachen (C-352/06); Rijksdienst voor Sociale Zekerheid v Herbosch Kiere NV (C-2/05); Lieselotte Hartmann Troiani v Landesversicherungsanstalt Rheinprovinz (C-368/87); Max Schaap v Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor Bank- en Verzekeringswezen, Groothandel en Vrije Beroepen (C-176/78); Fernand Liegeois v Office national des pensions pour travailleurs salariés (C-93/76); Fitzwilliam Executive Search Ltd v Bestuur van het Landelijk instituut sociale verzekeringen (C-202/97)