Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Cartier parfums — lunettes SAS and Axa Corporate Solutions assurances SA v Ziegler France SA and Others (C-1/13)
Judgment
The question referred for a preliminar…
32

Cartier parfums — lunettes SAS and Axa Corporate Solutions assurances SA v Ziegler France SA and Others (C-1/13)

Judgment of 27 Feb 2014law://eu/cjeu/2013/c-1-13/para_32@2026-11-10

32According to settled case-law, the provisions of that regulation must be interpreted independently, by reference to its scheme and purpose (see, Case C‑456/11 Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung and Others [2012] ECR, paragraph 25 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-1/13 · ECLI:EU:C:2014:109
Decided: 27 Feb 2014
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Cour de cassation (France)
Applicants: Cartier parfums – lunettes SAS; Axa Corporate Solutions assurances SA
Defendants: Ziegler France SA; Montgomery Transports SARL and 3 more
Inko Trade s. r. o.; Jaroslav Matěja; Groupama Transport
Rapporteur: C. Toader
Advocate General: N. Jääskinen
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, C.G. Fernlund, A. Ó Caoimh, C. Toader, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62013CJ0001

Topics

Judicial cooperation in civil matters

History · 1 version

27 Feb 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
Cited by 11: Irmengard Weber v Mechthilde Weber (C-438/12)2 provisions; ZX v Ryanair DAC (C-464/18); flyLAL-Lithuanian Airlines AS v Starptautiskā lidosta Rīga VAS and Air Baltic Corporation AS (C-302/13)2 provisions; Aannemingsbedrijf Aertssen NV and Aertssen Terrassements SA v VSB Machineverhuur BV and Others (C-523/14)2 provisions; Sophia Marie Nicole Sanders v David Verhaegen and Barbara Huber v Manfred Huber (C-400/13, C-408/13)2 provisions; Stefano Liberato v Luminita Luisa Grigorescu (C-386/17); Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v Acacia Srl (C-433/16); HanseYachts AG v Port D’Hiver Yachting SARL and Others (C-29/16); Taser International Inc. v SC Gate 4 Business SRL and Cristian Mircea Anastasiu (C-175/15); A v B (C-489/14)2 provisions; A v B and Others (C-112/13)2 provisions
Cites 7: Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; United Antwerp Maritime Agencies (Unamar) NV v Navigation Maritime Bulgare (C-184/12); Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG and Others v Samskip GmbH (C-456/11); Česká podnikatelská pojišťovna as, Vienna Insurance Group v Michal Bilas (C-111/09); Goldbet Sportwetten GmbH v Massimo Sperindeo (C-144/12); Elefanten Schuh GmbH v Pierre Jacqmain (C-150/80); Overseas Union Insurance Ltd and Deutsche Ruck Uk Reinsurance Ltd and Pine Top Insurance Company Ltd v New Hampshire Insurance Company (C-351/89)