111In the present case, the Commission addressed the arguments presented by Cisco and other interested parties in recitals 213 to 221 of the contested decision. Whilst it is true that that statement of reasons is succinct, it is not however contrary to the requirements of Article 296 TFEU, in the light of the specific context of the case.
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.