Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
John Dalli v European Commission (T-562/12)
Judgment
The request that Annexes 4 and 13 to t…
49

John Dalli v European Commission (T-562/12)

Judgment of 12 May 2015law://eu/cjeu/2012/t-562-12/para_49@2026-11-10

49In the present case, the Court observes, first, that it is not established that the applicant himself unlawfully obtained the documents whose removal from the case-file is requested, since he has produced the versions of those documents which were published in the Maltese press.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Third Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-562/12 · ECLI:EU:T:2015:270
Decided: 12 May 2015
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: John Dalli
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: N.J. Forwood
Bench: 5 judges
M. Jaeger, S. Papasavvas, N.J. Forwood, I. Labucka, E. Bieliūnas
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012TJ0562

Topics

Law governing the institutions

History · 1 version

12 May 2015Reading

Connections

Cited by 9: Nord Stream 2 AG v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-348/20 P)3 provisions; John Dalli v European Commission (C-615/19 P)2 provisions; Akgün Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ and Others v European Commission (T-231/23); TU v European Parliament (T-793/22); Agrofert, a.s. v European Parliament (T-174/21); Abdelkader Sabra v Council of the European Union (T-249/20); KN v European Economic and Social Committee (T-377/20); John Dalli v European Commission (T-399/17); QB v European Central Bank (T-827/16)2 provisions
Cites 15: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Guardian Industries Corp. and Guardian Europe Sàrl v European Commission (C-580/12 P); NV Algemene Transport- en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration (C-26/62); Automec Srl v Commission of the European Communities (T-64/89); ISAE/VP - Instituto Social de Apoio ao Emprego e à Valorização Profissional and Interdata - Centro de Processamento de Dados Ldª v Commission of the European Communities (C-130/91); 2010/80/: Decision of the European Council of 9 February 2010 appointing the European Commission; Société nouvelle des usines de Pontlieue - Aciéries du Temple (S.N.U.P.A.T.) v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community (C-42/59); Orlando Lopes v Court of Justice of the European Union (T-280/94); Europese Gemeenschap v Otis NV and Others (C-199/11); Yves Franchet and Daniel Byk v European Commission (T-48/05); Densmore Ronald Dover v European Parliament (T-149/09); Carlo De Nicola v European Investment Bank (T-7/98); Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF); Roderick Dunnett and Others v European Investment Bank (T-192/99)