Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
RFA International, LP v European Commission (T-466/12)
Judgment
Law
The second plea in law, alleging manif…
100

RFA International, LP v European Commission (T-466/12)

Judgment of 17 Mar 2015law://eu/cjeu/2012/t-466-12/para_100@2026-11-11

100It must be held that those changes in the structure of the CHEMK Group and in the organisation of its export sales to the Union represent a change in circumstances within the meaning of Article 11(9) of the Basic Regulation.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Second Chamber
Case: T-466/12 · ECLI:EU:T:2015:151
Decided: 17 Mar 2015
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: RFA International, LP
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: M.E. Martins Ribeiro
Bench: 3 judges
M.E. Martins Ribeiro, S. Gervasoni, L. Madise
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012TJ0466

Topics

History · 1 version

17 Mar 2015Reading

Connections

Cited by 11: Ege İhracatçıları Birliği and Others v European Commission (T-122/23); AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot and AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK 'Azot' v European Commission (C-725/22); AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot and AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK "Azot" v European Commission (T-865/19); PAO Severstal v European Commission (T-753/16); Interpipe Niko Tube OOO and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant PAO v European Commission (T-716/19)2 provisions; RFA International, LP v European Commission (C-56/19 P)2 provisions; Stemcor London Ltd and Samac Steel Supplies Ltd v European Commission (T-749/16); Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA v European Commission (T-301/16); Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie Ferrosplavy OAO (KF) v European Commission (T-487/14); RFA International, LP v European Commission (T-113/15); RFA International, LP v European Commission (C-239/15)
Cites 25: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (Codified version); Miwon Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-51/96); Huvis Corp. v Council of the European Union (T-221/05); Portuguese Republic v Council of the European Union (C-149/96); Compagnie maritime belge transports SA, Compagnie maritime belge SA and Dafra-Lines A/S v Commission of the European Communities (C-395/96 P, C-396/96 P); Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Materials Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (C-15/12 P); Minebea Company Limited v Council of the European Communities (260/84); Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Materials Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-423/09); Silver Seiko Limited and others v Council of the European Communities (273/85, 107/86); Nachi Fujikoshi Corporation v Council of the European Communities (255/84); Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 60/2012 of 16 January 2012 terminating the partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of ferro-silicon originating, inter alia, in Russia; Canon Inc. and others v Council of the European Communities (277/85, 300/85); Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities v Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT (Interpipe Niko Tube ZAT) and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT (Interpipe NTRP VAT) (C-191/09 P, C-200/09 P); Ikea Wholesale Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise (C-351/04); Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie ferrosplavy OAO (KF) v Council of the European Union (T-190/08); Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT (Interpipe Niko Tube ZAT) and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT (Interpipe NTRP VAT) v Council of the European Union (T-249/06); Beco Metallteile-Handels GmbH v European Commission (T-81/12); Michel Jamet v European Commission (37/71); Holland Malt BV v European Commission (C-464/09); Petrotub SA and Republica SA v Council of the European Union (C-76/00 P); Kundan Industries Ltd and Tata International Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-88/98); Canon Inc. v Council of the European Communities (C-171/87); Brother Industries Ltd v Council of the European Communities (250/85); EuroChem Mineral and Chemical Company OAO (EuroChem MCC) v Council of the European Union (T-84/07)