Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-442/12)
Judgment
Background to the dispute
4

Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-442/12)

Judgment of 1 Jun 2017law://eu/cjeu/2012/t-442-12/para_4@2026-11-10

4On 27 July 2005, the Commission adopted Regulation (EC) No 1259/2005 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of tartaric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2005 L 200, p. 73).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Eighth Chamber
Case: T-442/12 · ECLI:EU:T:2017:372
Decided: 1 Jun 2017
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: A.M. Collins
Bench: 3 judges
A.M. Collins, M. Kancheva, R. Barents
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012TJ0442

Topics

History · 1 version

1 Jun 2017Reading

Connections

Cited by 15: LG Chem, Ltd. v European Commission (T-356/22); China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products (CCCME) and Others v European Commission (T-263/22); Zheshartsky LPK OOO (ZHLPK) v European Commission (T-3/22); Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları TAŞ and Others v European Commission (T-629/21); Inner Mongolia Shuangxin Environment-Friendly Material Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-763/20); Sinopec Chongqing SVW Chemical Co. Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-762/20); Anhui Wanwei Updated High-Tech Material Industry Co. Ltd and Inner Mongolia Mengwei Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-764/20); Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission (C-123/21 P)3 provisions; AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot and AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK 'Azot' v European Commission (T-126/21); Hangzhou Dingsheng Industrial Group Co., Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-748/21); Kingdom of Cambodia and Cambodia Rice Federation (CRF) v European Commission (T-246/19); China Rubber Industry Association (CRIA) and China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (CCCMC) v European Commission (T-30/19); China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v European Commission (T-254/18)3 provisions; Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-541/18); Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v Distillerie Bonollo SpA and Others (C-461/18 P)7 provisions
Cites 25: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Comité des industries du coton et des fibres connexes de l'Union européenne (Eurocoton) and Others v Council of the European Union (C-76/01 P); Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-156/11); Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-424/13); Council Regulation (EEC) No 2176/84 of 23 July 1984 on protection against dumped or subsidized imports from countries not members of the European Economic Community; Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community; Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities v Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT (Interpipe Niko Tube ZAT) and Interpipe Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant VAT (Interpipe NTRP VAT) (C-191/09 P, C-200/09 P); Shanghai Excell M&E Enterprise Co. Ltd and Shanghai Adeptech Precision Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-299/05); Gem-Year Industrial Co. Ltd and Jinn-Well Auto-Parts (Zhejiang) Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-172/09); Transnational Company 'Kazchrome' AO and ENRC Marketing AG v Council of the European Union (T-192/08); Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-310/12); Foshan Shunde Yongjian Housewares & Hardware Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (C-141/08); European Wire Rope Importers Association (EWRIA) and Others v European Commission (T-369/08); Shanghai Bicycle Corporation v Council of the European Union (T-170/94); Industrie des poudres sphériques v Council of the European Union, Commission of the European Communities, Péchiney électrométallurgie and Chambre syndicale de l'électrométallurgie et de l'électrochimie (C-458/98 P); Al-Jubail Fertilizer Company (Samad) and Saudi Arabian Fertilizer Company (Safco) v Council of the European Communities (C-49/88); Shanghai Teraoka Electronic Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-35/01); Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (Codified version); Council of the European Union v Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial Group Co. Ltd (C-337/09 P); Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie ferrosplavy OAO (KF) v Council of the European Union (T-169/12); Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 626/2012 of 26 June 2012 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 349/2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of tartaric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China; Timex Corporation v Council and Commission of the European Communities (C-264/82); Ningbo Yonghong Fasteners Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-150/09); Shanghai Biaowu High-Tensile Fasteners Co. Ltd and Shanghai Prime Machinery Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (T-170/09); ‘Valimar’ OOD v Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Varna (C-374/12)