Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union (T-202/12)
Judgment
Law
The substance of the case
The third plea: no evidence of a suffi…
95

Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union (T-202/12)

Judgment of 12 Mar 2014law://eu/cjeu/2012/t-202-12/para_95@2026-11-10

95Second, the reference to ‘other key members of the Syrian regime’ is too vague and is not sufficient to justify the inclusion of the applicant’s name and retaining it on the lists of persons covered by the restrictive measures in question.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Sixth Chamber
Case: T-202/12 · ECLI:EU:T:2014:113
Decided: 12 Mar 2014
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Bouchra Al Assad
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: G. Berardis
Bench: 3 judges
H. Kanninen, G. Berardis, C. Wetter
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012TJ0202

Topics

Common foreign and security policy

History · 1 version

12 Mar 2014Reading

Connections

Cited by 24: Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union (T-603/24); Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union (T-602/24); Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council of the European Union (C-696/23 P)2 provisions; Aleksandra Melnichenko v Council of the European Union (T-1113/23); Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union (T-285/24); Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union (T-1107/23); Sara Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (T-387/24); Ghada Mhana v Council of the European Union (T-386/24); Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union (T-297/23); Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union (T-298/23); Aleksandra Melnichenko v Council of the European Union (T-498/22); Andrey Melnichenko v Council of the European Union (T-271/22); Marina Alexandrova Mordashova v Council of the European Union (T-497/22); Pavel Ezubov v Council of the European Union (T-741/22); Kinda Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (T-208/22); Shahla Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (T-209/22); Ghada Mhana v Council of the European Union (T-207/22); Dmitry Arkadievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union (T-742/22); State Development Corporation "VEB.RF" v Council of the European Union (T-288/22); Igor Shuvalov v Council of the European Union (T-289/22); Vadim Nikolaevich Moshkovich v Council of the European Union (T-283/22); Dmitry Arkadievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union (T-282/22); Viktor Filippovich Rashnikov v Council of the European Union (T-305/22); Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union (T-272/22)
Cites 22: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Unibet (London) Ltd and Unibet (International) Ltd v Justitiekanslern (C-432/05); Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (C-402/05); Stichting Al-Aqsa v Council of the European Union and Kingdom of the Netherlands v Stichting Al-Aqsa (C-539/10 P, C-550/10 P); European Commission and Others v Yassin Abdullah Kadi (C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P, C-595/10 P); Union nationale des entraîneurs et cadres techniques professionnels du football (Unectef) v Georges Heylens and others (222/86); 2013/255/CFSP: Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 May 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Syria; Council Decision 2011/782/CFSP of 1 December 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Syria and repealing Decision 2011/273/CFSP; Council Decision 2012/739/CFSP of 29 November 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Syria and repealing Decision 2011/782/CFSP; People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council of the European Union (T-256/07); Grand Duchy of Luxemburg v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-176/09); O and S v Maahanmuuttovirasto and Maahanmuuttovirasto v L (C-356/11, C-357/11); Alpha Steel Ltd. v Commission of the European Communities (14/81); Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret AS v Minister for Transport, Energy and Communications and others (C-84/95); Fahed Mohamed Sakher Al Matri v Council of the European Union (T-200/11); Bertelsmann AG and Sony Corporation of America v Independent Music Publishers and Labels Association (Impala) (C-413/06); Council of the European Union v Nadiany Bamba (C-417/11 P); French Republic v People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (C-27/09 P); Bank Melli Iran v Council of the European Union (T-390/08); Pye Phyo Tay Za v Council of the European Union (C-376/10 P)