Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky v Slovenská sporiteľňa a.s (C-68/12)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The fourth question
30

Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky v Slovenská sporiteľňa a.s (C-68/12)

Judgment of 7 Feb 2013law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-68-12/para_30@2026-11-10

30Since Article 101(3) TFEU is applicable only when an agreement prohibited under Article 101(1) TFEU has been found to exist, the Court’s answer assumes that such a finding has been made.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Tenth Chamber
Case: C-68/12 · ECLI:EU:C:2013:71
Decided: 7 Feb 2013
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia)
Applicant: Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky
Defendant: Slovenská sporiteľňa a.s.
Rapporteur: Rosas
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 3 judges
A. Rosas, E. Juhász, C. Vajda
Language: Slovak
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0068

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

7 Feb 2013Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)
Cited by 13: Tudapetrol Mineralölerzeugnisse Nils Hansen KG v European Commission (C-94/15); Crédit agricole SA and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v European Commission (T-113/17); JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Others v European Commission (T-106/17); LA International Cooperation Srl v European Commission (T-609/20); Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission (T-350/17); Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-340/17); Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission (T-334/17); Latam Airlines Group SA and Lan Cargo SA v European Commission (T-344/17); Groupe Canal + v European Commission (C-132/19 P)2 provisions; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (C-179/16)2 provisions; H&R ChemPharm GmbH v European Commission (C-95/15); SIA ‘VM Remonts’(formerly SIA ‘DIV un KO’) and Others v Konkurences padome (C-542/14)4 provisions; Fapricela - Indústria de Trefilaria, SA v European Commission (T-398/10)2 provisions
Cites 8: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (C-100/80); Établissements Consten S.à.R.L. and Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH v Commission of the European Economic Community (C-56/64); SCAC Srl v Associazione dei Produttori Ortofrutticoli (C-56/94); Comap SA v European Commission (C-290/11); KME Germany AG, KME France SAS and KME Italy SpA v European Commission (C-389/10 P); GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited v Commission of the European Communities and Commission of the European Communities v GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited and European Association of Euro Pharmaceutical Companies (EAEPC) v Commission of the European Communities and Asociación de exportadores españoles de productos farmacéuticos (Aseprofar) v Commission of the European Communities (C-501/06)