Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
P Oy (C-6/12)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The first question
44

P Oy (C-6/12)

Judgment of 18 Jul 2013law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-6-12/para_44@2026-11-10

44In addition, according to the Commission, the circumstances specified in Articles 144 and 172 of the Act of Accession in which Article 1(b)(i) of Regulation No 659/1999 concerning the definition of ‘existing aid’ would not be applicable are not relevant in the present case.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-6/12 · ECLI:EU:C:2013:525
Decided: 18 Jul 2013
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland)
Applicant: P Oy
Rapporteur: E. Juhász
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 5 judges
T. von Danwitz, A. Rosas, E. Juhász, D. Šváby, C. Vajda
Language: Finnish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0006

Topics

History · 1 version

18 Jul 2013Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)
Cited by 22: Congregación de Escuelas Pías Provincia Betania v Ayuntamiento de Getafe (C-74/16); Gmina Wrocław v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej (C-604/19)2 provisions; Staten genom Sjöfartsverket v Stockholms Hamn AB (C-401/24)2 provisions; Tiberis Holding Srl v Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA and Others (C-514/23); Banca Popolare di Bari SpA v European Commission (T-415/21); Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and Others v European Commission (C-451/21 P); Kingdom of Spain and Others v European Commission (C-649/20 P); Helsingin kaupunki v European Commission (T-597/19); Ireland and Others v European Commission (T-778/16, T-892/16); Havenbedrijf Antwerpen NV and Maatschappij van de Brugse Zeehaven NV v European Commission (T-696/17); Le Port de Bruxelles and Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v European Commission (T-674/17); Port autonome du Centre et de l'Ouest SCRL and Others v European Commission (T-673/17); Carrefour Hypermarchés SAS and Others v Ministre des Finances et des Comptes publics (C-510/16); European Commission v Kingdom of Spain and Others (C-128/16 P); Lowell Financial Services GmbH v European Commission (C-219/16); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-208/16); Dirk Andres v European Commission (C-203/16); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-209/16); Asociación Nacional de Grandes Empresas de Distribución (ANGED) v Generalitat de Catalunya (C-233/16); European Commission v World Duty Free Group SA and Others (C-20/15 P, C-21/15 P); Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) and European Commission vAlouminion tis Ellados VEAE (C-590/14 P)2 provisions; GFKL Financial Services AG v European Commission (T-620/11)
Cites 12: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Ministero dell'Industria, del Commercio e dell'Artigianato v Lucchini SpA (C-119/05); Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty; Centre d’exportation du livre français (CELF) and Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication v Société internationale de diffusion et d’édition (SIDE) (C-199/06); NDSHT Nya Destination Stockholm Hotell & Teaterpaket AB v European Commission (C-322/09 P); Portuguese Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-88/03); European Commission and Kingdom of Spain v Government of Gibraltar and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (C-106/09 P, C-107/09 P); Namur-Les Assurances du Crédit SA v Office National du Ducroire and the Belgian State (C-44/93); Adria-Wien Pipeline GmbH and Wietersdorfer & Peggauer Zementwerke GmbH v Finanzlandesdirektion für Kärnten (C-143/99); Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Agenzia delle Entrate v Paint Graphos Soc. coop. arl, Adige Carni Soc. coop. arl, in liquidation v Agenzia delle Entrate and Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Ministero delle Finanze v Michele Franchetto (C-78/08, C-79/08, C-80/08); Déménagements-Manutention Transport SA (DMT) (C-256/97); Kremikovtzi AD v Ministar na ikonomikata, energetikata i turizma i zamestnik-ministar na ikonomikata, energetikata i turizma (C-262/11)